2020
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2020.1728319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving accuracy models using elastic net regression approach based on empirical mode decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response variable is simulated according to one or two components from the predictor variables. This notion is in line with the simulation study proposed by (Qin et al, 2016;Al-Jawarneh et al, 2020) for generating variables.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response variable is simulated according to one or two components from the predictor variables. This notion is in line with the simulation study proposed by (Qin et al, 2016;Al-Jawarneh et al, 2020) for generating variables.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…LASSO regression based on decomposition components via EMD method (Qin et al, 2016). ELNET regression based on EMD method proposed to deal with nonlinear and non-stationary original univariate time-series predictor case (Al-Jawarneh et al, 2020). Kernel Ridge regression based on the decomposition components via EMD (Naik et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was regarded as an improved form of multiple linear regression using ordinary least squares [65]. Recent studies demonstrated superior performance in using ENet over other regression methods in handling multicollinearity of predictors for numerical predictions [66,67].…”
Section: The Use Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for higher accuracy estimation and to minimize the mean-squared prediction error, we tuned the parameters α and λ through 5-fold cross-validation. [75,76]. Data division was random and performed automatically by the software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%