2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-010-9277-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving adaptive capacity and resilience in Bhutan

Abstract: Bhutan, Adaptive capacity, Climate change adaptation, Resilience,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing hazards (GLOFs), low incomes, lack of institutional capacity, remoteness (Meenawat and Sovacool 2011) Himalaya, India State led policy aimed at addressing the requirements of vulnerable areas and groups to enable them to adapt to variability of water supply and risks associated with glacial lake outbursts. Glacial retreat (Furunes and Mykletun 2012) 11 % were implemented and finished.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing hazards (GLOFs), low incomes, lack of institutional capacity, remoteness (Meenawat and Sovacool 2011) Himalaya, India State led policy aimed at addressing the requirements of vulnerable areas and groups to enable them to adapt to variability of water supply and risks associated with glacial lake outbursts. Glacial retreat (Furunes and Mykletun 2012) 11 % were implemented and finished.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous small supra-glacial ponds on the debris-covered terminus were integrated into several large lakes during the second half of the 20th century [5,6]. Because the area is accessible and there is concern over such large supra-glacial lakes, the United Nations Development Programme supported the Government of Bhutan to install a water drainage outlet for this lake [31][32][33]. Since 2009, about 350 local workers, every summer, have attempted to control the water level.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Multiple Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Bhutan, only experts and institutions were reported to have been consulted, and community members were excluded (Meenawat & Sovacool, 2011). Cambodia's project collaborated with community stakeholders in a vulnerability risk assessment prior to project implementation, yet this workshop was held after project design was already completed (ALM, 2010d; D'Agostino & Sovacool, 2011).…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagement In Project Design and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project also created a detailed exit strategy to outline future sources of support and actions to continue project aims (ALM, 2010g). Successfully mainstreaming an intervention into local institutions was challenging for ten of the case studies, mainly due to low institutional capacity and lack of interest (ALM, 2008Bekturova, 2011b;Bran, 2011;D'Agostino & Sovacool, 2011;Levin, 2011a;Meenawat & Sovacool, 2011;Rawlani & Sovacool, 2011;UNDP, 2012). B Replicability:…”
Section: B Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%