Improving AHP for construction with an adaptive AHP approach (A3)

Lin, Chun Chang; Wang, Wei‐Chih; Yu, Wen

doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2007.03.004

Cited by 134 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, Marzouk and Moselhi [29] designed a model for estimating markup and evaluating bid proposal using multi-attribute utility theory and AHP. Furthermore, Lin et al [30] applied an adaptive AHP approach to determine the weightings of multiple criteria for solving a bestvalue-bid problem. Overall, a multi-criteria evaluation scheme has been employed for real-life situations.…”

Section: Ahp For Determining Criteria Weightingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects

Lai

Wang

2008

Automation in Construction

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Ahp For Determining Criteria Weightingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Then, the CI is divided by the random CI to acquire the consistency ratio (CR) [30]. When CR is N 0.1, pairwise comparison results should be rejected.…”

Section: Criteria Weightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects

Lai

Wang

2008

Automation in Construction

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the single criterion, statistical model is adopted. To facilitate the multi-criteria evaluation AHP model [14] is used because it is suitable to be adopted when there is a finite set of attributes to be considered in the evaluation process [17,18,19,21,22,23]. Firstly, the AHP model is experimented to foresee for its possible deficiency or impediment before it is implemented in the selected case study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Integrated Decision Support Model in Tendering

Ahmad

Saman

2011

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.Tendering is an important issue that requires Decision Support System (DSS) attention as a decision to award tenders to certain competing applications could influence successful completion of a project. This paper presents a framework of DSS for a tendering process based on a combination of single criteria statistical model, weighted model and an extended AHP model known as Guided AHP (GAHP). This hybrid model allows single criteria tender prices which are considered abnormal to be excluded from further detail multicriteria GAHP evaluation. GAHP is proposed to minimize the possibility of inconsistent data entry and to improve evaluation accuracy and flexibility. The use of model integration takes the advantage of their strengths and complements each other's weaknesses. Finally, a real organizational government tendering application is applied to demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework.

show abstract

“…The influence of various factors on work efficiency and quality should be also evaluated. To make effective decisions in technological and management areas as well as in the processes of automation in construction, etc., expert systems (Česnauskis 2007;Podvezko et al 2010;Zavadskas et al 2005;Wu et al 2008;Abdelrahman et al 2008;Chua and Li 2000;Liu et al 2009;Brauers et al 2008;Мальцев, Захаренков 2007), multicriteria evaluation methods (Ginevičius and Podvezko 2008;Žvirblis and Zinkevičiūtė 2008;Sivilevičius et al 2008;Turskis et al 2009), decision support systems TOP-SIS and SAW (Jakimavičius and Burinskienė 2007;Liu 2009;Liaudanskienė et al 2009;Zavadskas et al 2010), games theory ) and AHP (Ginevičius et al 2004;Skibniewski and Chao 1992;Lin et al 2008;Lai et al 2008;Pan 2008;Podvezko 2009;Ustinovichius et al 2007;Vainiūnas et al 2009) method are commonly used. The procedures of ranking based on statistical hypotheses and their verification are also applied (Weed et al 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Criteria for Identifying the Quality of Passengers’ Transportation by Railway and Their Ranking Using Ahp Method

Sivilevičius

Maskeliūnaitė

2010

Transport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Passengers' transportation by rail involving various interested groups, such as managers, service staff and passengers, is a complicated process. Decision-making persons, organizing railway trips should take into account the interests, needs and possibilities of these particular groups. The solution to some problems associated with passengers' transportation by rail depends on the experience and qualification of decision-makers, people who are responsible for the effectiveness of this work. To increase the quality of railway trips, the interested parties, groups of people mentioned above, should coordinate their actions, cooperate with each other in solving the problems and exchange relevant information. Therefore, the increasing quality of passenger transportation is a complicated issue, requiring good professional skills based on knowledge, practical experience, high intellect and new ideas of all the people involved in this process. The current paper presents a diagram showing passenger's transportation quality with a number of criterion groups A, B, C, D matching the structure and numbers of the questions included in the questionnaires to survey respondents (passengers) and experts (service and administration staff of the train). What is more, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology based on the pair wise comparison of criteria is used to determine their weights (significances) considering the data obtained from the respondents and experts of each of three categories. Only these questionnaires which have no contradictory estimates are used. Also, the calculation methods demonstrating the results of the survey are provided in this work. One more point such as the data elicited from the respondents who took part in the survey (i.e. passengers from the train running on the international route Vilnius-Moscow) and experts (i.e. service staff of the already mentioned train and representatives of the administration staff from the Joint-Stock Company 'Lithuanian Railways' (AB ,,Lietuvos geležinkeliai")) is analyzed. Finally, the conclusions for improving the quality for passenger transportation by Lithuanian railways are given.

show abstract

Improving AHP for construction with an adaptive AHP approach (A3)

Cited by 134 publications

References 27 publications

AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects

AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects

Application of Integrated Decision Support Model in Tendering

The Criteria for Identifying the Quality of Passengers’ Transportation by Railway and Their Ranking Using Ahp Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About