2018
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201846069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving animal research reporting standards

Abstract: The HAARP guidelines aim to set a global minimum standard for reporting results from and details of research experiments using animals. Their adoption would contribute to more transparency in research and improve reproducibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, modeling of enterovirus infections in animals has certain features that are primarily due to their selective sensitivity to particular types of enteroviruses. Thus, for Coxsackie B viruses effective models are laboratory mice of 1-3 days of age, among polioviruses only 2 serotypes cause clinical symptoms in adult mice, and only with parenteral administration, and to mouse ECOS viruses are not at all sensitive [2,7,11,12]. In general, it should be noted that despite the presence of a certain amount of scientific work on modeling of enterovirus infection in animals, detailed information on the features of the course and factors affecting the infection process is not enough [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, modeling of enterovirus infections in animals has certain features that are primarily due to their selective sensitivity to particular types of enteroviruses. Thus, for Coxsackie B viruses effective models are laboratory mice of 1-3 days of age, among polioviruses only 2 serotypes cause clinical symptoms in adult mice, and only with parenteral administration, and to mouse ECOS viruses are not at all sensitive [2,7,11,12]. In general, it should be noted that despite the presence of a certain amount of scientific work on modeling of enterovirus infection in animals, detailed information on the features of the course and factors affecting the infection process is not enough [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘Animal Research: Reporting in-Vivo Experiments’ (ARRIVE) [64] and the Schedule Of Enrolment, Interventions, And Assessments (SPIRIT) reporting guidelines [65] have been considered and integrated into this study protocol were applicable (see also Additional file 2) .…”
Section: Methods and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include (1) that in spite of a reasonable number of studies on the topic, there were often few studies examining the same pairwise comparison; (2) there was a lack of standardised outcome measures relevant to well-being and timepoints for comparison; (3) many studies were at high risk of bias, either by virtue of study design or deficiencies in reporting. When considering that there have been significant and repeated recent efforts to improve the reporting standards of animal research, and that guidelines to assist animal research have been widely available since 2010 [63][64][65][66], the overall poor quality of reporting of the included studies is problematic. Simple details prescribed by the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, such as description of the randomisation procedure, were only reported by three studies published after 2010 (of 16 total).…”
Section: Evidence Completeness and Quality And Recommendations For Fumentioning
confidence: 99%