2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9770-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving basin scale shallow landslide modelling using reliable soil thickness maps

Abstract: Soil thickness is a well-known factor controlling shallow landsliding. Notwithstanding, its spatial organisation over large areas is poorly understood, and in basin scale slope analyses it is often established using simple methods. In this paper, we apply five different soil thickness models in two test sites, and we use the obtained soil thickness maps to feed a slope stability model. Validation quantifies how errors in soil thickness influence the resulting factor of safety and points out which method grants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Lanni et al, 2013) or soil thickness (e.g. Catani et al, 2010;Segoni et al, 2012), is still one of the most difficult and laborious parameters to measure on a catchment scale, yet it is crucial for physically based modelling of slope stability (Dietrich et al, 1995;Lanni et al, 2012;Segoni et al, 2012). It is defined as the thickness of unconsolidated material covering the earth's surface, i.e.…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lanni et al, 2013) or soil thickness (e.g. Catani et al, 2010;Segoni et al, 2012), is still one of the most difficult and laborious parameters to measure on a catchment scale, yet it is crucial for physically based modelling of slope stability (Dietrich et al, 1995;Lanni et al, 2012;Segoni et al, 2012). It is defined as the thickness of unconsolidated material covering the earth's surface, i.e.…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the depth of past landslides can be derived from multitemporal, remotely sensed elevation data (Zieher et al, 2016). For regolith depth mapping, regression models correlating regolith depth to either elevation, slope angle or other derivatives were used in previous case studies on shallow landslide susceptibility (Baum et al, 2010;Lanni et al, 2012;Salciarini et al, 2006;Segoni et al, 2012). For the assessment of regolith depth in the Laternser valley, 126 dynamic cone penetration tests (DCPTs) were conducted along four transects.…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to: the necessary simplifications introduced in hydrological and geotechnical models (Crosta and Frattini, 2003;, the errors introduced by rainfall predictions (Jakob et al, 2012), the consequences of the uncertainties in the knowledge of morphometric, mechanical and hydrological parameters of soils (Segoni et al, 2012) and the extremely high computational effort required to operate on a basin scale .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4); and (2) a map of the soil thickness -interpreted as the depth to bedrock -based on the simplified geomorphologically indexed soil thickness (sGIST) model (Catani et al 2010;Segoni et al 2012) (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%