2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving berry and wine quality attributes and vineyard economic efficiency by long-term deficit irrigation practices under semiarid conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PRD is now being imposed on an expanding list of crop species with frequently observed improvements in water‐use efficiency, little reduction in yield and improvements in crop quality over RDI (e.g. tomato, Solanum lycopersicum , Kirda et al ., ; grapevine, Vitis vinifera , Romero et al ., ; potato, Solanum tuberosum , Liu et al ., ; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum , Tang et al ., ), but not universally (Sadras, ). The improvements in horticultural crop quality through PRD and RDI occur through stress‐induced increases in secondary metabolite content, which are known contributors to quality in fruits such as grape and tomato (Davies et al ., ).…”
Section: Case Studies Demonstrating Successful Research Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRD is now being imposed on an expanding list of crop species with frequently observed improvements in water‐use efficiency, little reduction in yield and improvements in crop quality over RDI (e.g. tomato, Solanum lycopersicum , Kirda et al ., ; grapevine, Vitis vinifera , Romero et al ., ; potato, Solanum tuberosum , Liu et al ., ; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum , Tang et al ., ), but not universally (Sadras, ). The improvements in horticultural crop quality through PRD and RDI occur through stress‐induced increases in secondary metabolite content, which are known contributors to quality in fruits such as grape and tomato (Davies et al ., ).…”
Section: Case Studies Demonstrating Successful Research Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of Antolín et al (2006Antolín et al ( , 2008 showed that under PRD changes in ABA content improved berry quality by increasing anthocyanin content and that increased mRNA induced accumulation of genes responsible for anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (Jeong et al, 2004). According to Romero et al (2016) reduced vegetative growth and increased light penetration into the canopy in PRD vines together with the increased ABA content and salicylic acid (in berries at harvest) might have an increasing effect on production of phenolic compounds which have a different roles (as antioxidants, stabilizators of anthocyanins, for wine color, etc). The same study reported that elevated amino acids concentration was also associated with their role as antioxidants and osmoprotectants as well as precursors for the synthesis of some aromatic substances important for the taste of wine.…”
Section: Crop and Fruit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no differences between the last two treatments. Under water stress, the grapes were normally smaller due to lower availability of water for cellular elongation (ROMERO et al, 2016), which reflected in the lower weight of bunches. Bassoi et al (2011) showed that the water deficit generally results in smaller grapes and modifies the mineral composition of the fruit, then corroborating the results from this study.…”
Section: Weight Of Brunchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the increased sugar concentration was due to the dehydration in some of the grapes in the bunch, and the reduced bunch weight was a result of the lower water supply by the treatments DI and RDI. This is a consequence of the increased skin/pulp ratio, which is favored by a low availability of water for cellular elongation (ROMERO et al, 2016;PEYNAUD, 1997). The treatments that led to lower weight in grape bunches (DI and RDI) were those that had higher alcohol values in the wines ( present work (Table 2) are within the values established by legislation, which allows variation between 4.12 and 9.75 g L -1 of tartaric acid (BRASIL, 2004).…”
Section: Wine Physicochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%