Improving Bioinformatics Prediction of microRNA Targets by Ranks Aggregation

Abstract

microRNAs are noncoding RNAs which downregulate a large number of target mRNAs and modulate cell activity. Despite continued progress, bioinformatics prediction of microRNA targets remains a challenge since available software still suffer from a lack of accuracy and sensitivity. Moreover, these tools show fairly inconsistent results from one another. Thus, in an attempt to circumvent these difficulties, we aggregated all human results of four important prediction algorithms (miRanda, PITA, SVmicrO, and TargetScan) showing additional characteristics in order to rerank them into a single list. Instead of deciding which prediction tool to use, our method clearly helps biologists getting the best microRNA target predictions from all aggregated databases. The resulting database is freely available through a webtool called miRabel 1 which can take either a list of miRNAs, genes, or signaling pathways as search inputs. Receiver operating characteristic curves and precision-recall curves analysis carried out using experimentally validated data and very large data sets show that miRabel significantly improves the prediction of miRNA targets compared to the four algorithms used separately. Moreover, using the same analytical methods, miRabel shows significantly better predictions than other popular algorithms such as MBSTAR, miRWalk, ExprTarget and miRMap. Interestingly, an Fscore analysis revealed that miRabel also significantly improves the relevance of the top results. The aggregation of results from different databases is therefore a powerful and generalizable approach to many other species to improve miRNA target predictions. Thus, miRabel is an efficient tool to guide biologists in their search for miRNA targets and integrate them into a biological context.

Computational Methods and Software Tools for Functional Analysis of miRNA Data

“…In this way, they reduce the selection of interactions to a unique database based on an intuitive score and allow comparing databases between them. Several authors agree with the union of algorithms methods using different approaches [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”

Chromosome Painting in Cultivated Bananas and Their Wild Relatives (Musa spp.) Reveals Differences in Chromosome Structure

“…The identification of chromosome translocations pointed to particular Musa subspecies as putative parents of cultivated clones and provided an independent support for hypotheses on their origin. While we have unambiguously identified a range of translocations, a precise determination of breakpoint positions will have to be done using a long-read DNA sequencing technology [ 71 , 72 , 73 ].…”

MiR-130a-3p blocks Wnt signaling cascade in the triple-negative breast cancer by targeting the key players at multiple points

“…Meanwhile, a wide range of computational methods has been developed to recognize the targets of miRNAs [25]. While these methods are important as an initial step to study the miRNAs and target genes, their outcomes are variable [17]. Hence, there is a need for the credible approaches to identify the targets of miRNA with admissible accuracy and sensitivity.…”

“…Meanwhile, transcriptomic, proteomic, and computer-based approaches have provided valuable insights into the identification of miRNA targets [15,16]. Among these approaches, computer-based methods are not only very simple, time-saving, and cost-effective, but also are important as an initial step in studying the miRNAs and target genes [17].…”