2020
DOI: 10.1111/tme.12736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving blood‐prescribing decisions: Evaluating the efficacy of a blood guidelines app

Abstract: Objectives: To assess the effect of an app providing national blood transfusion guidelines on prescribing decisions. Background: National, regional and local audits in England consistently show inappropriate use of all blood components; around 15%-20% of red blood cells (RBC) and 20%-30% of platelets and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Hospital transfusion guidelines may be difficult to locate and not agree with national guidelines. We developed and tested a dedicated app providing national evidence-based guideline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuing efforts are needed to support practising physicians by adhering to current guideline recommendations [39]. For example, computerised decision support using a smartphone app with the provision of evidence-based recommendations can improve adherence to transfusion guidelines [40]. Other interventions that can reduce the overuse of RBC transfusions among inpatients include education, combined with alerts in the electronic health record system [41,42], and audit and feedback [43], mostly implemented in multifaceted interventions [44,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing efforts are needed to support practising physicians by adhering to current guideline recommendations [39]. For example, computerised decision support using a smartphone app with the provision of evidence-based recommendations can improve adherence to transfusion guidelines [40]. Other interventions that can reduce the overuse of RBC transfusions among inpatients include education, combined with alerts in the electronic health record system [41,42], and audit and feedback [43], mostly implemented in multifaceted interventions [44,45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since taking the App off the market following the simulated impact study, the App was not re‐issued for download, mainly due to resource constraints post pilot. However, the NHSBT's Patient Blood Management Team has since worked with clinicians and invested in other Apps, such as Blood Components 20 . In addition, there were imminent changes to the MHRA medical device regulations which need to be considered before re‐issue of a CE‐marked App.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the NHSBT's Patient Blood Management Team has since worked with clinicians and invested in other Apps, such as Blood Components. 20 In addition, there were imminent changes to the MHRA medical device regulations which need to be considered before re-issue of a CE-marked App. To minimise resource allocation, the Blood Choices App is being reviewed and will be made available for use as an educational, rather than a decision support, tool.…”
Section: Study Weaknessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evolving point-of-care apps can automatically generate cardiac indices from a single snapshot of an arterial waveform or measure exact pupillary light reflex in unconscious patients [27,28]. The Point-of-care clinical support apps have been shown to improve skills in managing local anesthetic toxicity, malignant hyperthermia, and peri-operative blood prescribing [29][30][31][32]. This diversity makes point-of-care apps particularly useful to anesthetists who must be able to manage a broad array of problems across the physiological spectrum.…”
Section: Point Of Care Healthcare Provider Clinical Decision Support ...mentioning
confidence: 99%