2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving bonding quality of underwater friction stitch welds by selecting appropriate plug material and welding parameters and optimizing joint design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The friction stud welding (FSW) method has many advantages (Yin et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2018), such as high efficiency, low material consumption, and non-pollution. Therefore, this method has been developing rapidly in the underwater application (Zhang et al, 2016). Many researchers have carried out a series of researches on the application of FSW technology in underwater junction (Nicholas, 1984;Gao et al, 2014), and this technology is gradually applied to the connection of less important comparatively structures such as sacrificial anode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction stud welding (FSW) method has many advantages (Yin et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2018), such as high efficiency, low material consumption, and non-pollution. Therefore, this method has been developing rapidly in the underwater application (Zhang et al, 2016). Many researchers have carried out a series of researches on the application of FSW technology in underwater junction (Nicholas, 1984;Gao et al, 2014), and this technology is gradually applied to the connection of less important comparatively structures such as sacrificial anode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repair of damaged parts in offshore (subsea/underwater) and onshore environments is requisite to prolong the service/useful life of structural parts, reduce part-replacement cost, and fabrication lead-time of new parts (Zhang et al, 2016). The conventional underwater/wet arc welding methods are known to be prone to hydrostatic pressure-induced arc instability once the depth at which welding/repair is mandatory goes beyond 40 m (Zhang et al, 2016). Also, an additional operational cost is usually incurred in welding/repairing parts at underwater depths beyond 40 m as a dry chamber/cabin is required to ensure the safety of welders/divers (Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional underwater/wet arc welding methods are known to be prone to hydrostatic pressure-induced arc instability once the depth at which welding/repair is mandatory goes beyond 40 m (Zhang et al, 2016). Also, an additional operational cost is usually incurred in welding/repairing parts at underwater depths beyond 40 m as a dry chamber/cabin is required to ensure the safety of welders/divers (Zhang et al, 2016). Thus, there is a need to have a repair strategy or method that will be suitable for underwater repairs irrespective of the level of underwater depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations