2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving canine welfare in commercial breeding (CB) operations: Evaluating rehoming candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the cone represented a novel, motionless object to which this population of dogs had never been exposed, these findings may suggest that the dogs in our sample may not have been adequately exposed to enough novel objects during their lives in the kennels to have been unafraid of the traffic cone. This finding has welfare implications as dogs that struggle to cope when presented with a motionless object, such as a plastic cone, are also likely to struggle when exposed to an unfamiliar household once re-homed, thus potentially resulting in a stressful transition [ 11 ]. It could be argued that the presentation of a novel object is, by design, fear-inducing and that any dog may react fearfully to such an exposure, even if well-socialized, so conclusions about lack of socialization should be drawn with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the cone represented a novel, motionless object to which this population of dogs had never been exposed, these findings may suggest that the dogs in our sample may not have been adequately exposed to enough novel objects during their lives in the kennels to have been unafraid of the traffic cone. This finding has welfare implications as dogs that struggle to cope when presented with a motionless object, such as a plastic cone, are also likely to struggle when exposed to an unfamiliar household once re-homed, thus potentially resulting in a stressful transition [ 11 ]. It could be argued that the presentation of a novel object is, by design, fear-inducing and that any dog may react fearfully to such an exposure, even if well-socialized, so conclusions about lack of socialization should be drawn with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stimulus–response test conducted was a three-step stranger approach in which the tester: (1) opened the pen door with a sideways orientation and without making direct eye contact with the focal dog, (2) offered a treat to the dog directly from her hand, always maintaining a sideways orientation, and (3) offered a second treat from one hand while reaching to gently touch the dog with the other hand. Finally, the tester stepped back from the pen and closed the gate (adapted from [ 11 ]). The second response test consisted of placing a plastic orange traffic cone into the pen with the dog and locking the pen gate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FitBark 2 dog activity monitor (referred to herein as Fitbark; FitBark Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA) which is a 3-axis accelerometer, is affordable, user-friendly, and easily accessible. However, to our knowledge, although they have been used to monitor dog activity in published studies [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], no peer-reviewed studies have externally evaluated FitBark criterion validity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate FitBark criterion validity by correlating FitBark activity data to dog physical activity, measured via step count.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%