2013
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Chronic Disease Care by Adding Laypersons to the Primary Care Team

Abstract: Adding care guides to the primary care team can improve care for some patients with chronic disease at low cost.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Adding CHWs to the primary care team can improve care and coordination for patients with chronic disease at low cost. 35 As part of a care team, CHWs can support care management and provide care coordination across settings, in patients’ homes, and at community locations. For example, when a patient is discharged from a hospital, a CHW can provide follow-up support as the person transitions home and can facilitate follow-up visits with the primary care provider and other providers and services.…”
Section: Results: Areas Of Integration For Chw Into Ppaca Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Adding CHWs to the primary care team can improve care and coordination for patients with chronic disease at low cost. 35 As part of a care team, CHWs can support care management and provide care coordination across settings, in patients’ homes, and at community locations. For example, when a patient is discharged from a hospital, a CHW can provide follow-up support as the person transitions home and can facilitate follow-up visits with the primary care provider and other providers and services.…”
Section: Results: Areas Of Integration For Chw Into Ppaca Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded 64 From the database searches we identified 22 references containing potential economic evaluations. Following full-text review, eight 58,83,94,103,114,115,122,123 of these references were excluded and 14 references 59,62,67,69,70,85,87,89,95,105,117,[124][125][126] reporting economic outcomes were included in the review.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included studies were conducted between 1988 and 2013. Thirty-five studies (53%) were parallel-group patient RCTs enrolling 237,025 patients 59,[61][62][63]71,72,75,80,82,[85][86][87][88][89]95,96,98,99,102,103,[107][108][109][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122] and 31 (47%) were cluster RCTs in which the HCP or the health-care setting was the unit of randomisation. 58,60,64-70, 73,74,76-79,81,83,84,90-94,97,100,101,104-106,110,123 These included 6126 clusters (range 6-4125 clusters).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Their interventions are most often directed to and studied in underserved communities (racial and ethnic minority and low-income populations, federally qualified health care [FQHC] settings), where the integration of these workers show benefit. 3,4,12,[21][22][23] Health authorities have called for expanding interventions by CHWs among clinics serving these populations, and recent policies create a platform for greater community health worker integration. [24][25][26] Researchers have explored the experience of CHWs with integration into care teams and examined how health care delivery systems might be 27-31 Experts have outlined implementation barriers (fragmented and disease-specific interventions, lack of clear work protocols, high turnover, variable performance, and a history of low-quality evidence), but argue that these barriers can be overcome through established standards to ensure a skilled CHW workforce, clearly defined roles, concrete implementation strategies, and an expanded scope of reimbursable services to include their services.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%