2019
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.f9377.088619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Classifier Accuracy for diagnosing Chronic Kidney Disease Using Support Vector Machines

Abstract: Preventing Chronic Kidney Disease has become one of the most intriguing task to the healthcare society. The major objective of this paper is to deal mainly with different classification algorithms namely NaiveBayes, Multi Layer Perceptron and Support Vector Machine. The work analyzes the Chronic Kidney Disease dataset taken from the machine learning repository of UCI. Pre-processing techniques such as missing value replacement, unsupervised discretization and normalization are applied to the Chronic Kidney Dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of accuracy and the time required for classification are taken as the results of the study. This study states that the implementation results using SVM are superior to other classification methods [3] .…”
Section: Previous Researchesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The value of accuracy and the time required for classification are taken as the results of the study. This study states that the implementation results using SVM are superior to other classification methods [3] .…”
Section: Previous Researchesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…When a problem cannot be split linearly in the input space, a kernel function in SVM is used. The kernel function defined in equation (13).…”
Section: Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Thangaraj [13] analyzed the CKD dataset obtained from the UCI machine learning repository. Pre-processing techniques such as missing value replacement, unsupervised discretion, and standardization were used to improve the accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%