Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater clinical judgment rubric in Chinese

Abstract

BackgroundThe development and assessment of clinical judgment ability are essential in nursing education. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) was shown to be valid in evaluating nursing students’ learning outcomes and skills in western cultures but has not been validated in mainland China. This study aimed to compare a simulation-teaching model with a traditional teaching method in enhancing the clinical judgment ability of nursing undergraduate students and to validate the Chinese version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (C-LCJR).MethodsFour classes of nursing students (n = 157) at Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, China, were randomly assigned to two control and two experimental classes. The experimental classes were taught using simulation teaching with standardized patients, while the control classes were taught using traditional teaching methods. At the end of the experiment, students in both kinds of classes evaluated their clinical judgment using the C-LCJR. Teachers also rated the students but without knowing who had received the simulation teaching. Confirmatory factor analysis and a Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model with Bayesian estimation was fit to the rating data to investigate measurement properties and experimental effects.ResultsCompared to the control classes, students in the experimental classes performed better in all subdomains of C-LCJR (noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting). The measurement properties of the C-LCJR were found to be satisfactory with high factor loadings and reliabilities and no bias from age, gender, and raters.ConclusionsThe simulation teaching model is more effective than the traditional (non-simulation-based) teaching method in improving clinical judgment of Chinese nursing students. The C-LCJR is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring clinical judgment in nursing students in China.

A Cross-Sectional Study: What Contributes to Nursing Students’ Clinical Reasoning Competence?

“…A previous systematic review reported that problem-based learning could improve nurses’ integrative thinking and reflection processes by providing comprehensive clinical situations [ 50 ]. Additionally, nursing curriculums that included simulations and provided realistic situations helped improve students’ nursing procedures, communication skills, empathy, clinical judgment, and self-efficacy [ 63 , 64 ].…”

Aspectos positivos e negativos da simulação clínica no ensino de enfermagem

“…In addition, it allows the participant to apply the theoretical content taught in the classroom and develop necessary skills for professionals in clinical practice. 15 Positive and negative aspects of clinical simulation Rosa MEC, Pereira-Ávila FMV, Góes FGB, Pereira-Caldeira NMV, Sousa LRM, Goulart MCL Theoretical teaching, associated with simulation, promotes the development of critical thinking in nursing students. If they are directed to practical teaching in clinical settings, it can cause considerable damage to health and even concern patients because they do not have enough skills to act in care.…”

Three learning modalities' impact on clinical judgment and perceptions in newly graduated registered nurses: A quasi‐experimental study

“…The sum score distinguishes four phases of clinical judgment: beginning (11 points), developing (12–22 points), accomplished (23–33 points), and exemplary (34–44 points) (Georg et al, 2019). The Chinese version of the LCJR reported high factor loadings and reliabilities and no bias from age, gender, or raters (Yang et al, 2019). In this study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.902.…”