2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving competitiveness through performance evaluation using the APC model: A case in micro-irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an analytic tool for integrity management must be interactive and not solely involve decision makers. Many been adapted and used in many different contexts including construction engineering ones (Rao et al 2018;Zavadskas et al 2011). The strength and weakness can investigate internal capabilities while the threat and opportunity investigate the external environment.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, an analytic tool for integrity management must be interactive and not solely involve decision makers. Many been adapted and used in many different contexts including construction engineering ones (Rao et al 2018;Zavadskas et al 2011). The strength and weakness can investigate internal capabilities while the threat and opportunity investigate the external environment.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enterprise performance management enables continuous improvement with the help of performance analysis tools (Cokins 2013). Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis is a static strategic framework that has been used in studies examining strategic management in construction and engineering companies to evaluate the management effectiveness (Zavadskas et al 2011), to manage water resources (Rao et al 2018), and more (Bull et al 2016;Jaber et al 2015;Njoh 2017). The present study similarly uses SWOT with internal interviews and a dynamic based strategy (Ghemawat 2016) to collect expert perception since the method can be easily adapted and includes external and internal context for a better understanding of the company's reality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have examined the efficiency differentials in specific processes (Kao and Hwang, 2014;Cullmann et al, 2009;Hashimoto and Haneda, 2008). The limitation of many performance measurement models is that they do not consider diverse measures covering different stakeholder needs including customers, shareholders, employees and suppliers (Rao et al, 2018). The key strength of DEA, as a methodology, lies in its capability to simultaneously incorporate multiple inputs and outputs providing a technique to understand firm performance differentials that is deeper than a mere comparison of firm profits (Chien-Ming Chen, 2015).…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long and Blok (2018) define responsible innovation as the ideal approach to integrate these aspects, bridging entrepreneurial needs with the pursuit of an innovation conducted for – and with the engagement of – society. Nonetheless, in many studies, the trade-off between dominant business logics, resource constraints, unequal contribution and stakeholder engagement (Long et al , 2016b; Long and Block, 2018; Rao et al , 2018) poses serious challenges to such target. Long and Blok (2018) suggest the need for open innovation approaches, to foster collaborations and provide incentives to the reach of both economical and societal objectives, thus towards the definition of sustainable models.…”
Section: Relevant Avenues For the Future Development Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%