2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2009.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving d-mannitol productivity of Escherichia coli: Impact of NAD, CO2 and expression of a putative sugar permease from Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In resting cells of E. coli BL21 (DE3) three genes were simultaneously expressed such as mdh, fdh and glf which encodes mannitol, formate dehydrogenase and a sugar facilitator, respectively, and thus the productivity of d-mannitol formation obtained with the strain expressing the additional fupL gene was enhanced by 20%. In an expression system a fusion protein was prepared for mannitol-2-dehydrogenase mtlK in pRSET vector in E. coli BL21pLysS on isopropyl-~-D-thiogalactopyranoside induction system for mannitol formation at pH 5.35 [ 60 ]. Similarly genetically engineered L. plantarum TF103 carrying the mtlK gene of L. brevis overexpressor reported to produce mannitol from glucose.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Mannitol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In resting cells of E. coli BL21 (DE3) three genes were simultaneously expressed such as mdh, fdh and glf which encodes mannitol, formate dehydrogenase and a sugar facilitator, respectively, and thus the productivity of d-mannitol formation obtained with the strain expressing the additional fupL gene was enhanced by 20%. In an expression system a fusion protein was prepared for mannitol-2-dehydrogenase mtlK in pRSET vector in E. coli BL21pLysS on isopropyl-~-D-thiogalactopyranoside induction system for mannitol formation at pH 5.35 [ 60 ]. Similarly genetically engineered L. plantarum TF103 carrying the mtlK gene of L. brevis overexpressor reported to produce mannitol from glucose.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Mannitol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract NADH, 250 ml cell cultures were centrifuged at 4600 rcf for 5 min and resuspended in extraction buffer [1 ml of 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 ml of methanol ( Heuser et al, 2009 )]. After the addition of 2 ml of chloroform, NADH extraction was performed by shaking the tube for 1.5 h at 25°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the recombinant E. coli BL21 (DE3) expressing glf, fdh and mdh was able to and Gao (1996) High yield High material cost and polluted form 362 mM D-mannitol from an initial 500 mM D-fructose of within 8 h, and the molar yield Y D-mannitol/D-fructose reached 84% and a specific productivity was more than 4 g D-mannitol g −1 (cell dry weight) h −1 (Kaup et al, 2004). In order to overcome the instability of the recombinant strain, which possibly caused by factors such as the internal pH change of the cells, loss of cofactor NAD, high formate concentrations and export of D-mannitol, the fupL gene was additionally expressed in biotransformation experiments, and the final D-mannitol productivity of the strain was enhanced by 20% (Heuser et al, 2009). Secondly, in order to convert D-glucose to D-mannitol, an intracellular glucose isomerase, formate dehydrogenase, D-mannitol dehydrogenase, glucose isomerase, and glucose facilitator were co-expressed in the E. coli strain I, resulting in the production of up to 821 mM D-mannitol at the optimized pH and temperature (Kaup et al, 2005).…”
Section: Synthesis Of D-mannitol In Recombinantmentioning
confidence: 99%