2021
DOI: 10.1177/19389655211025475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Data Quality Using Amazon Mechanical Turk Through Platform Setup

Abstract: As the use of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) has increased among social science researchers, so, too, has research into the merits and drawbacks of the platform. However, while many endeavors have sought to address issues such as generalizability, the attentiveness of workers, and the quality of the associated data, there has been relatively less effort concentrated on integrating the various strategies that can be used to generate high-quality data using MTurk samples. Accordingly, the purpose of this resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further ensure proper execution and response quality, this study followed several guidelines (Lu et al , 2021). The participants were prescreened with the following criteria: at least 18 years old, with an approval rate equal to or higher than 97%, 300 or more previous experiences in completing tasks and location restricted to the USA.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further ensure proper execution and response quality, this study followed several guidelines (Lu et al , 2021). The participants were prescreened with the following criteria: at least 18 years old, with an approval rate equal to or higher than 97%, 300 or more previous experiences in completing tasks and location restricted to the USA.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, our participants were recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Although previous studies have found MTurk produces valid and reliable data (Lu et al., 2022 ), some concerns have been noted about data quality (Aguinis et al., 2021 ). To ensure quality control in our study, we included several validity checks and conducted additional data screening procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered a valuable and superior platform for online experiments compared to other commonly used platforms (Palan and Schitter, 2018). We followed the suggestions of Lu et al (2021) to provide rigorous procedures on similar platforms. After removing incomplete responses and reviewing screening questions and attention checks, 212 responses were retained for further data analysis for Study 2 and 182 responses for Study 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%