Improving Death Certificate Completion: A Trial of Two Training Interventions

Abstract

The death certificate is an important medical document that impacts mortality statistics and health care policy. Resident physician accuracy in completing death certificates is poor. We assessed the impact of two educational interventions on the quality of death certificate completion by resident physicians. Two-hundred and nineteen internal medicine residents were asked to complete a cause of death statement using a sample case of in-hospital death. Participants were randomized into one of two educational interventions: either an interactive workshop (group I) or provided with printed instruction material (group II). A total of 200 residents completed the study, with 100 in each group. At baseline, competency in death certificate completion was poor. Only 19% of residents achieved an optimal test score. Sixty percent erroneously identified a cardiac cause of death. The death certificate score improved significantly in both group I (14 ± 6 vs 24 ± 5, p < 0.001) and group II (14 ± 5 vs 19 ± 5, p < 0.001) postintervention from baseline. Group I had a higher degree of improvement than group II (24 ± 5 vs 19 ± 5, p < 0.001). Resident physicians' skills in death certificate completion can be improved with an educational intervention. An interactive workshop is a more effective intervention than a printed handout.

Racial/Ethnic and Gender Disparities in Renal Cell Carcinoma Incidence and Survival

“…20 Other potential causes of this observed disparity include biological differences in the tumor and in male versus female patients, as well as the higher prevalence of hypertension in males versus females. 16 As with most studies, the findings of this study must be generalized with caution. Gaps in data completeness for staging and, to a much lesser extent, race/ethnicity may affect accuracy.…”

“…5 However, death certificate accuracy is often as low as 40% due to wording inaccuracies and lack of training among physicians. 16 Because of this and because 10% of the patients in this study did not even have a death certificate available, it was decided that the cause of death data was not an effective means for accounting for co-morbidities.…”

Acurácia da equipe do Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade na seleção da causa básica do óbito em capital no Sul do Brasil

“…Estudo 24 . No pré-teste, apenas 15% dos médicos do grupo 1 e 16% do grupo 2 identificaram corretamente a causa do óbito, perfazendo um total geral de 15,5% de adequação no preenchimento da DO.…”

Trend of Ill-Defined Causes of Death in Egypt (2000–2013) in Comparison to Selected Eastern Mediterranean Countries, and an Intervention Study to Improve The Accuracy of Death Certification in One District in Cairo, Egypt

“…Similarly a study by Myers et al from Canada which implemented a 75-min seminar showed that the percent of certificates with at least one major error was dropped from 32.9 to 15.7%. While Lakkiredoly et al from USA revealed that a 45-min workshop enabled 15.5% of residents to identify correctly the cause of death (17). Concerning the minor errors in Afzal Azim et al, all pre intervention had no time intervals (100%) and use of abbreviation (89.3%) after intervention there was a statistically significant decrease to 22.6% and 29.3% respectively whereas in Myers et al the probability of finding at least one minor error did not change significantly after the intervention (18).…”