2020
DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2020.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Diagnosis of Depression With XGBOOST Machine Learning Model and a Large Biomarkers Dutch Dataset (n = 11,081)

Abstract: Machine Learning has been on the rise and healthcare is no exception to that. In healthcare, mental health is gaining more and more space. The diagnosis of mental disorders is based upon standardized patient interviews with defined set of questions and scales which is a time consuming and costly process. Our objective was to apply the machine learning model and to evaluate to see if there is predictive power of biomarkers data to enhance the diagnosis of depression cases. In this research paper, we aimed to ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated three machine learning models: XGBoost, XGBoost + SMOTEENN, and logistic regression [38][39][40]. XGBoost is widely used due to its high efficiency and predictability, and it has been used to predict health care outcomes in patients with [41,42] and without [43][44][45] COVID-19. In our study, XGBoost was the most accurate prediction model, with an accuracy of 0.919 (SD 0.028) and precision of 0.521 (SD 0.329; Figure 1), similar to the findings of another study that examined combined outcomes [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated three machine learning models: XGBoost, XGBoost + SMOTEENN, and logistic regression [38][39][40]. XGBoost is widely used due to its high efficiency and predictability, and it has been used to predict health care outcomes in patients with [41,42] and without [43][44][45] COVID-19. In our study, XGBoost was the most accurate prediction model, with an accuracy of 0.919 (SD 0.028) and precision of 0.521 (SD 0.329; Figure 1), similar to the findings of another study that examined combined outcomes [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the nal ensemble GIN model was obtained using the three best models. Speci cally, the sigmoid prediction scores from the best models were averaged to obtain the nal prediction score of the ensemble model, which is a process known as "soft voting" 51,52 .…”
Section: Ensemble Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is measured, what is a time bounding and expensive procedure. The purpose of doing so, is to make an application of the machine learning prototype and assessment of discovering whether a speculative ability of patient data is there for augmenting the detection of the events related to dejection [6,10,47,48]. In this research, there is a target to create a podium which will be able to categorize the dataset into reappearance and non-reappearance.…”
Section: Background Studymentioning
confidence: 99%