Improving echographic monitoring of hemodynamics in critically ill patients: Validation of right cardiac output measurements through the modified subcostal window

Fernandez, Leandro; Martínez, GA; Gandía, María Beatriz Serna; León, Gaspar Tuero; Cuesta-Montero, Pablo; Boy, R. Cuena; Pereira, R. Vicho

doi:10.1016/j.medin.2022.01.006

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the cutoff for normal is slightly lower for RVOT VTI, generally greater than 14 cm (30, 31). However, evidence suggests there is moderate agreement in comparing the RVOT VTI obtained from a subcostal SAX view and LVOT VTI in critically ill patients, and this view was obtained in 90% of patients (32). RVOT VTI has also been shown to correlate to cardiac index, with a cutoff of less than 9.5 cm highly predictive of cardiac index less than 2.2 L/min/m 2 and associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients with pulmonary embolism (33).…”

Section: Inadequate Parasternal and Apical Windowsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Point-of-Care Echocardiography in the Difficult-to-Image Patient in the ICU: A Narrative Review

Grotberg,

McDonald,

2024

Critical Care Explorations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this narrative review was to address common obstacles encountered in the ICU to acquiring quality and interpretable images using point-of-care echocardiography. DATA SOURCES: Detailed searches were performed using PubMed and Ovid Medline using medical subject headings and keywords on topics related to patient positioning, IV echo contrast, alternative subcostal views, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) hemodynamics, and point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography. Articles known to the authors were also selected based on expert opinion. STUDY SELECTION: Articles specific to patient positioning, IV echo contrast, alternative subcostal views, RVOT hemodynamics, and point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: One author screened titles and extracted relevant data while two separate authors independently reviewed selected articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Impediments to acquiring quality and interpretable images in critically ill patients are common. Notably, body habitus, intra-abdominal hypertension, dressings or drainage tubes, postoperative sternotomies, invasive mechanical ventilation, and the presence of subcutaneous emphysema or lung hyperinflation are commonly encountered obstacles in transthoracic image acquisition in the ICU. Despite these obstacles, the bedside clinician may use obstacle-specific maneuvers to enhance image acquisition. These may include altering patient positioning, respiratory cycle timing, expanding the subcostal window to include multilevel short-axis views for use in the assessment of RV systolic function and hemodynamics, coronal transhepatic view of the inferior vena cava, and finally point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: Despite common obstacles to point-of-care echocardiography in critically ill patients, the beside sonographer may take an obstacle-specific stepwise approach to enhance image acquisition in difficult-to-image patients.

show abstract