2010
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2010.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving effectiveness and efficiency in the water sector: institutions, infrastructure and indicators

Abstract: This special edition is devoted to the theme of water institutions, infrastructure and performance indicators and how they matter to the effectiveness and efficiency of the water sector. It explores many questions which have not been adequately addressed in the literature. For example, what do we know about institutional reforms in the water sector? Can regulation improve the performance of government-controlled water utilities? What explains the choices amongst governance mechanisms in the water sector? How d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different legislation as well as concepts and definitions may be used in each country which reduces the comparability of the data (Araral, 2010). Moreover, fluctuations in the purchasing power parity, the different levels of outsourcing, specific differences on explanatory factors and other contrasts like wages, taxes and tariff rules often hinder the validity of the findings (De Witte and Marques, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different legislation as well as concepts and definitions may be used in each country which reduces the comparability of the data (Araral, 2010). Moreover, fluctuations in the purchasing power parity, the different levels of outsourcing, specific differences on explanatory factors and other contrasts like wages, taxes and tariff rules often hinder the validity of the findings (De Witte and Marques, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual SEM, with hypothesized relationships between variables, is shown in Figure . The solid lines show the hypotheses informed by published SEM research, , whereas postulated hypotheses based on strong theory (not previously tested by SEM) are shown with dashed lines. One example of how these relationships can be read is as follows: perceived water quality is negatively influenced by perceived health risks from one’s current living conditions and positively influenced by measured water quality , safe water practices , and satisfaction with the dwelling environment .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of researchers have utilized SEM to identify factors that impact perceived water quality, while others have relied on summary statistics to analyze perception of sanitation and water quality in underserved communities. ,, The impacts of environmental health and household demographics on diarrheal health burden were explored with SEM in rural Guatemala and Brazil. , Specifically, this technique quantified the impact of higher education level, proper water filter maintenance, and improved water supply on reducing diarrheal health burden . Another study used a comparative SEM technique (i.e., grouping different sample populations) to reveal that environmental exposure variables related to diarrhea and systemic inflammation proxies varied between female and male children under five .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central reason for these mixed results comes from the measures used to evaluate WSU performance (Berg & Marques, 2011;Araral, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%