Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information &Amp; Knowledge Management 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3340531.3411897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving End-to-End Sequential Recommendations with Intent-aware Diversification

Abstract: Sequential recommenders that capture users' dynamic intents by modeling sequential behavior, are able to accurately recommend items to users. Previous studies on sequential recommendations (SRs) mostly focus on optimizing the recommendation accuracy, thus ignoring the diversity of recommended items. Many existing methods for improving the diversity of recommended items are not applicable to SRs because they assume that user intents are static and rely on post-processing the list of recommended items to promote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to persistent groups often have stable members and rich historical interactions [43,65], previous studies [13,31,50] on this kind of group were mainly focused on treating groups as pseudousers, and then adopt conventional personalized recommendation techniques [12,14] for making group recommendations. For example, to estimate the rating that a group of members might give to an item, Chen et al [13] proposed a genetic algorithm-based recommendation method by predicting the possible interactions among group members.…”
Section: Persistent Group Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to persistent groups often have stable members and rich historical interactions [43,65], previous studies [13,31,50] on this kind of group were mainly focused on treating groups as pseudousers, and then adopt conventional personalized recommendation techniques [12,14] for making group recommendations. For example, to estimate the rating that a group of members might give to an item, Chen et al [13] proposed a genetic algorithm-based recommendation method by predicting the possible interactions among group members.…”
Section: Persistent Group Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filter bubbles and related biases have been studied in the context of recommender systems [26], with recent work studying e-commerce websites [10] and widely-used algorithms [48]. One approach that has been explored for mitigating these biases is judging recommendations not only by accuracy, but with other metrics such as diversity (difference between recommendations) [6,46], novelty (items assumed unknown to the user) [47], and serendipity (a measure of relevance and surprise associated with a positive emotional response) [44].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may lead scientists to concentrate on narrower niches [18], reinforcing citation inequality and bias [27] and limiting cross-fertilization among different areas that could catalyze innovation [13]. Addressing filter bubbles in general, in domains such as social media and e-commerce recommendations, is a hard and unsolved problem [6,10,48]. The problem is especially difficult in the scientific domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, we combine 𝑐 2 and 𝑢 1 to get the recombined preferences 𝑃 ′ 1 , and we combine 𝑐 1 and 𝑢 2 to get the recombined preferences 𝑃 ′ 2 through the preference recombination operation. Based on the above process, we can devise two types of SSL signals: (1) We use the recombined preferences to predict the next item in both sequences; and (2) We require that the recombined preferences (e.g., 𝑃 ′ 1 ) are as similar as possible to the original preferences (e.g., 𝑃 1 ), and that the common preference representations are close to each other (i.e., 𝑐 1 = 𝑐 2 ). By doing so, we force the preference extraction model to learn how to identify and edit user preferences so as to do better user preference extraction and representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Figure 1, the traditional methods only obtain a mixed preference representation for each sequence while they ignore relations between other sequences. Recent research has investigated how to identify multiple preferences through a multi-head attention mechanism on top of RNN-based methods [1,2,8]. But to the best of our knowledge, this has not been explored in transformer-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%