2011 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icrtit.2011.5972337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving energy efficiency and reliability using multiple mobile sinks and hierarchical clustering in wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy consumption in computation is negligibly small compared to energy dissipation in other process such as sensing, transmission and reception of a bit as shown by Hoang and Motani [9]. Intra-cluster traffic can be varied if we change the size of the cluster accordingly by varying the number of nodes in a cluster.…”
Section: Mobile Sink Communicationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Energy consumption in computation is negligibly small compared to energy dissipation in other process such as sensing, transmission and reception of a bit as shown by Hoang and Motani [9]. Intra-cluster traffic can be varied if we change the size of the cluster accordingly by varying the number of nodes in a cluster.…”
Section: Mobile Sink Communicationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…LEACH, TEEN, APTEEN are cluster based routing protocols, whereas PEGASIS is a chain-based protocol. The performance of APTEEN lies between TEEN and LEACH with respect to energy consumption and longevity of the network [9]. …”
Section: Various Clustering Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So an application like continuous monitoring of data would not extract much benefit from this approach. In [11], multiple mobile sinks are used in hierarchical cluster based network. In our approach, we use both mobile and static sink as in [10], along with Timer and Distance based Routing (TDR) protocol, to enhance energy efficiency for a continuous monitored data application.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-to-end re-transmission requires only the source node that generated the packet to re-transmit the lost packet. Whereas, hop-by-hop retransmission allows the intermediate nodes to perform retransmission of lost packets by caching the information Another way to achieve data transport reliability is by introducing information redundancy where multiple copies of the same packet are transmitted based on erasures codes that allows receiver to recover from independent packet loss [3]. Iyer et al [5] proposed Sensor Transmission Control Protocol (STCP)which is a generic (sensor-to-sink) end-to-end transport protocol providing both congestion control and reliability.…”
Section: Reliability Of Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEACH, TEEN, APTEEN [18][19][20][21] are cluster based routing protocols, whereas PEGASIS is a chain-based protocol. The performance of APTEEN lies between TEEN and LEACH with respect to energy consumption and longevity of the network [18].…”
Section: Wsn Nodes Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%