2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00175-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group are the models in which input quantities can be proportionally reduced without changing the outputs quantities produced, whereas in the second group the output quantities can be proportionally expanded keeping the input quantities unchanged. Selection of the method is depending on the nature of problem to be solved (Allen & Thanassoulis, 2004;Bal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Deamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group are the models in which input quantities can be proportionally reduced without changing the outputs quantities produced, whereas in the second group the output quantities can be proportionally expanded keeping the input quantities unchanged. Selection of the method is depending on the nature of problem to be solved (Allen & Thanassoulis, 2004;Bal et al, 2010).…”
Section: Deamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain realistic and acceptable weights, a multitude of ways to capture value judgements or prior information in DEA are proposed in literature (Allen & Thanassoulis, 2004;Allen et al, 1997). For a country with a very high score on alcohol for example, all input weight could be assigned to this indicator and all output weight to a very low number of fatalities.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a realistic ranking a multitude of ways to capture value judgements or prior information in DEA is proposed in the literature (e.g. Allen and Thanassoulis, 2004;Allen et al, 1997). Here, the contribution of each indicator pie share (i.e.…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%