2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0266462310001303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment

Abstract: To act on these recommendations for ethics analysis, we offer these three steps forward: acknowledge and use relevant expertise, further develop models for conducting and reporting ethics analyses, and make use of untapped resources in the literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HTA claims to include the medical, economic, legal and ethical implications of technologies. Unfortunately, although ethics is an acknowledged part of HTA, there is scant evidence that ethical issues are commonly addressed to assess treatments [52][53][54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTA claims to include the medical, economic, legal and ethical implications of technologies. Unfortunately, although ethics is an acknowledged part of HTA, there is scant evidence that ethical issues are commonly addressed to assess treatments [52][53][54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is hardly surprising, since the very ambitious definition of HTA has led to similar results abroad too. For instance, the scant evidence of addressing ethical issues in our survey is widespread elsewhere [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ethics is always claimed to be a very important HTA component, its implications on specific technologies are hardly ever reported [20,21], so the lack of ethical studies on TR was not surprising. The only study indirectly concerning TR was a qualitative survey conducted in a Dutch teaching hospital [22] on a few terminal patients (15) with MBC or metastatic colon-rectal cancer.…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%