“…Research studies have conclusively demonstrated positive relationships between this form of educator support (Prensky, ; Pape et al, ), and scholastic self‐determination (Abeysekera and Dawson, ; Barrett et al, ), and engagement (Hansen, ; Bradley et al, ; Brass et al, ). The practice of AST also contributes to the development of IM by providing a rationale for choices (Tai et al, ; Queen and Hess, ), empathizing with the perspectives of students (Ten Cate et al, ; Hickman et al, ), and minimizing the use of controlling language (Mohr et al, ; Lopes et al, ; Meza et al, ) in the teaching environment. These practices provide students with the opportunity to pursue unique individual goals (Woolley and Fishbach, ) and interests (Ezell et al, ; Agius et al, ), and satisfy their needs for autonomy (Woolley and Fishbach, ) and competence (Desy et al, ; Gauer and Jackson, ).…”