2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2008.07.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving extraction and transport simulations of the superconducting ECR ion source VENUS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this low pressure, the loss rate of confined electrons seems to exceed the rate of their trapping. Only when the pressure was raised to the low 10 −6 mbar, close to fully neutralized beams could be observed [24]. This is consistent with measurements at the cyclotron institute in Jyväskylä where it was observed that the ion beam emittance values decreased with increasing pressure in the beam Figure 16.…”
Section: Neutralization Level Of the Beamsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At this low pressure, the loss rate of confined electrons seems to exceed the rate of their trapping. Only when the pressure was raised to the low 10 −6 mbar, close to fully neutralized beams could be observed [24]. This is consistent with measurements at the cyclotron institute in Jyväskylä where it was observed that the ion beam emittance values decreased with increasing pressure in the beam Figure 16.…”
Section: Neutralization Level Of the Beamsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The neutralization is due to rest gas ionization in the beam line and accumulation of now free electrons around the beam. In a previous work, it was experimentally observed that although the beam is not pulsed, the extracted ion beams are not fully neutralized at pressures of less than 2e-7 mbar in the beam line [14]. Therefore different neutralization levels were tested in the model by scaling the total beam current.…”
Section: Results From Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work compared well to measurements of high intensity proton [11] and H + 2 [6] beams, which can be considered highly compensated. However, comparison of simulated and measured emittances as well as measurements of the ion beam potential in the Low Energy Beam Transport (LEBT) lines of Electron Cyclotron Resonance Ion Sources (ECRIS) suggested beams far from fully compensated [12,13]. Hence one of the major assumptions in Gabovich's work no longer holds: quasi-neutrality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%