2017
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000003531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes in Syndromic Patients With Webbed Neck Deformity

Abstract: A staged, combination approach of endoscopic-assisted fasciectomy and strategic local tissue reconstruction of the posterior hairline to correct WND achieves good functional and aesthetic results and good patient satisfaction. This modification should be considered when managing WND.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After completion of the title and abstract screen, 41 articles were assessed by full text review according to the aforementioned criteria. Twenty-two manuscripts were deemed to have met full inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the final scoping review 5,6,10,11,15–31. The manuscripts were published across 10 countries between the years of 1980 and 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After completion of the title and abstract screen, 41 articles were assessed by full text review according to the aforementioned criteria. Twenty-two manuscripts were deemed to have met full inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the final scoping review 5,6,10,11,15–31. The manuscripts were published across 10 countries between the years of 1980 and 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-two manuscripts were deemed to have met full inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the final scoping review. 5,6,10,11,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The manuscripts were published across 10 countries between the years of 1980 and 2020. The full screening and review process according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines is described in Figure 1.…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation