2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving gene set analysis of microarray data by SAM-GS

Abstract: Background: Gene-set analysis evaluates the expression of biological pathways, or a priori defined gene sets, rather than that of individual genes, in association with a binary phenotype, and is of great biologic interest in many DNA microarray studies. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) has been applied widely as a tool for gene-set analyses. We describe here some critical problems with GSEA and propose an alternative method by extending the individual-gene analysis method, Significance Analysis of Microarra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
232
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
232
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A weighted-voting procedure with leave-one-out cross validation was used to identify the optimal gene subset (n = 11) for classifying samples by parity group (GenePattern; ref. 20) and significance analysis of microarray-gene set (SAM-GS) analysis was used for gene set hypothesis testing (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A weighted-voting procedure with leave-one-out cross validation was used to identify the optimal gene subset (n = 11) for classifying samples by parity group (GenePattern; ref. 20) and significance analysis of microarray-gene set (SAM-GS) analysis was used for gene set hypothesis testing (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, 5 of 28 inflammation-related genes chosen for analysis, or 18%, were differentially regulated between the nulliparous and parous groups. We applied SAM-GS analysis (21) to test the hypothesis that parity status was associated with expression of 28 genes in the inflammation gene set as a group. This analysis, which is similar to a summary t-test approach, yielded a P value of 0.03, indicating that the process of inflammation is differentially regulated between the nulliparous and parous groups.…”
Section: Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Four methods were used to compare gene sets and sample groups: GSA 20 : R package GSA; globaltest 21 : R package globaltest; SAM-GS 22 : original R code; and the Tuckey algorithm described in Table 4 of Ref. 23: original R code).…”
Section: Affymetrix Genechip Data Mining-identification Of Biologicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The IGA method requires an initial calculation of differentially expressed genes that is influenced by the statistical methods and their thresholds. Since the emergence of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), an increasing number of GSA approaches based on various statistical methods have been rapidly developed, such as GSEA, 7,8 globaltest, 9 SAM-GS, 10 GlobalANCOVA, 11 ADGO 12,13 and Bayesian network-based pathway analysis. 14 Tian et al 15 classified two types of null hypotheses that test whether a gene set displays a coordinated association with a phenotype of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%