2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-014-1369-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving genetic search in XCS-based classifier systems through understanding the evolvability of classifier rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We enforce at least one feature be present in each CC, and that the allowable set of values for each included feature be non-empty; this precludes the problem, discussed in Llorà et al (2005), of evolving clauses that cannot match any instances in the dataset. We allow CCs to have up to L features present, since we do not wish to make arbitrary a priori assumptions on the maximum order of epistatic interactions that may exist and because, as shown in Iqbal et al (2015), higher-order CCs can be useful in finding epistatic lower-order CCs.…”
Section: Representation Of Conjunctive Clauses (Ccs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We enforce at least one feature be present in each CC, and that the allowable set of values for each included feature be non-empty; this precludes the problem, discussed in Llorà et al (2005), of evolving clauses that cannot match any instances in the dataset. We allow CCs to have up to L features present, since we do not wish to make arbitrary a priori assumptions on the maximum order of epistatic interactions that may exist and because, as shown in Iqbal et al (2015), higher-order CCs can be useful in finding epistatic lower-order CCs.…”
Section: Representation Of Conjunctive Clauses (Ccs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiplexer problem, designed to predict the output of an electronic multiplexer circuit, is another scalable Boolean benchmark problem. The multiplexer problem was first introduced to the machine learning community by Barto (1985), and has been a standard benchmark problem for testing LCS approaches for decades (Wilson, 1987a,b;Booker, 1989;Goldberg, 1989;De Jong and Spears, 1991;Butz et al, 2003Butz et al, , 2004Butz et al, , 2005Bacardit and Krasnogor, 2006;Llorà et al, 2008;Franco et al, 2011;Ioannides et al, 2011;Calian and Bacardit, 2013;Iqbal et al, 2012Iqbal et al, , 2013aIqbal et al, ,b,c, 2014Iqbal et al, , 2015Urbanowicz and Moore, 2015).…”
Section: The Multiplexer Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original XCS paper by Wilson [118], the rule discovery was applied to the match set, but later it was moved to the action set in order to reduce the number of inaccurate classifiers produced in the system [119]. If the rule discovery operation is applied to the match set, building blocks of information can be efficiently used for the evolution of potentially good classifiers [60]. This suggestion is supported by the evolution of the maximally general, accurate and correct classifier '001### : 1' shown in Figure 8.5.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original XCS paper by Wilson [118], the rule discovery was applied to the match set, but later it was moved to the action set in order to reduce the number of inaccurate classifiers produced in the system [119]. If the rule discovery operation is applied to the match set, building blocks of information can be efficiently used for the evolution of potentially good classifiers [60]. This suggestion is supported by the evolution of the maximally general, accurate and correct classifier '001### : 1' shown in Figure 8.5.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%