Improving Health Care Quality and Patient Safety Through Peer-to-Peer Assessment: Demonstration Project in Two Academic Medical Centers

Abstract

Despite decades of investment in patient safety, unintentional patient harm remains a major challenge in the health care industry. Peer-to-peer assessment in the nuclear industry has been shown to reduce harm. The study team's goal was to pilot and assess the feasibility of this approach in health care. The team developed tools and piloted a peer-to-peer assessment at 2 academic hospitals: Massachusetts General Hospital and Johns Hopkins Hospital. The assessment evaluated both the institutions' organizational approach to quality and safety as well as their approach to reducing 2 specific areas of patient harm. Site visits were completed and consisted of semistructured interviews with institutional leaders and clinical staff as well as direct patient observations using audit tools. Reports with recommendations were well received and each institution has developed improvement plans. The study team believes that peer-to-peer assessment in health care has promise and warrants consideration for wider adoption.

Could students’ experiences of clinical placements be enhanced by implementing a Collaborative Learning in Practice (CliP) model?

“…The coaching techniques that inform the CLiP model have previously been used successfully in medical training, and have been reported to provide a major contribution to junior doctors' development of their own personal and professional identity (Brannagan et al 2013;de Lasson et al 2016). Furthermore, such coaching has been shown to improve quality and safety where peer assessment has been implemented (Mort et al, 2017). Coaching, unlike mentoring, can be seen as short term and skill-specific, focusing on development and improvement (Huggins, 2016).…”

Access to Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Developing World: Barriers and Solutions

“…In several DC, there are university facilities where the healthcare quality is usually better. In developed as in DC, academic centers mostly offer better patient security and reach major improving in healthcare quality [64,65]. The influence of these academic centers can help to get better healthcare through teaching, guidelines, and even changing inappropriate healthcare policies.…”

Changing the narratives for patient safety

“…infections), specific areas (e.g. operating rooms) or entire quality and safety programmes 17 . These reviews are confidential, disciplined, deliberate and not part of a regulatory process that applies sanctions.…”