2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving homogeneity by dynamic speed limit systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variable speed limit is known to be able to increase homogeneity of driving speeds (i.e. optimise and smooth the traffic flow) and consequently improve road safety (Van Nes et al, 2010). Other information can also be displayed, for example, drivers can be directed to use the hard shoulder during congested periods so as to smooth the traffic flow.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variable speed limit is known to be able to increase homogeneity of driving speeds (i.e. optimise and smooth the traffic flow) and consequently improve road safety (Van Nes et al, 2010). Other information can also be displayed, for example, drivers can be directed to use the hard shoulder during congested periods so as to smooth the traffic flow.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drivers' willingness and ability to comply with speed limits is affected by factors such as speed limit credibility and the design of speed signs. A study by van Nes, Brandenburg, and Twisk (2010) indicated that appreciation of VSLs by drivers in terms of usefulness and acceptance is higher compared to their static counterpart. Research on the design of signs for VSLs pointed out that they are best displayed on electronic signs per driving lane on overhead gantries, as this is where they are expected and how they attract most attention (Chang & Li, 2008;Hoogendoorn, Harms, Hoogendoorn, & Brookhuis, 2012;Rämä, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Over time, these systems have been improved with more accurate and lanespecific loop detectors; and more diversified lane-specific messages, but the essence has not changed. What has changed is that in some cases these CWS (both sensors and variable message signs) are also used for different purposes, for example, for speed homogenization or pro-active congestion management with dynamic speed limits (2,3). With the arrival of alternative sensing systems (other than loops), and the possibility of using the vehicle itself as both sensor and actuator, one of the key questions for road operators today is whether continuous investments in infrastructure-based CWS is a costeffective strategy for the near-term (and longer term) future.…”
Section: Green Open Access Added To Tu Delft Institutional Repositorymentioning
confidence: 99%