Given my role as Quantitative Methods Editor forTo help organize key factors that contribute to quality reports of quantitative methods, I propose a three-legged metaphorical stool akin to Swanson' s (1995) three-legged stool that identified key theoretical foundations of HRD. The three legs are: (1) statistical assumptions, (2) data analysis, and (3) statistically and practically significant results. In Figure 1, I list the three proposed frameworks of quantitative research, from left to right, in a logical order to facilitate discussion: statistical assumptions (left), data analysis (middle), and statistically and practically significant results (right). In reality, I think many researchers (myself included) sometimes sidestep the process of testing for statistical assumptions in their eagerness to see if they will get a p-value less than 0.05. One wonders how often reviewers think to question the validity of findings that are presented without evidence that data were tested against associated statistical assumptions. One also wonders how much time readers spend consuming the data analysis or finding sections of articles based on quantitative methodologies before moving on to the discussion