Recent Hurricane Research - Climate, Dynamics, and Societal Impacts 2011
DOI: 10.5772/14224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Hurricane Intensity Forecasting through Data Assimilation: Environmental Conditions Versus the Vortex Initialization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative trajectory prediction error results show that the orbital error in the MP test improves from 9% to 32% compared to the trajectory prediction error in the MI test, and improves from 4% to 30% compared to the trajectory prediction error in the PF test at most forecasting terms. This result may be due to the multiphysics technique (determining the error of the model due to the incomplete understanding of physical processes [4,9] has partly corrected the error of the model. So that the received background field has a significantly reduced error, and leads to a more accurate analysis field for the input of the model than the multiplicative inflation technique and considers the model perfect.…”
Section: Track Stormmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative trajectory prediction error results show that the orbital error in the MP test improves from 9% to 32% compared to the trajectory prediction error in the MI test, and improves from 4% to 30% compared to the trajectory prediction error in the PF test at most forecasting terms. This result may be due to the multiphysics technique (determining the error of the model due to the incomplete understanding of physical processes [4,9] has partly corrected the error of the model. So that the received background field has a significantly reduced error, and leads to a more accurate analysis field for the input of the model than the multiplicative inflation technique and considers the model perfect.…”
Section: Track Stormmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work depends heavily on the quality of the observed data (related to the error of the observed data) and the quality of the model's background guess data (related to the model's intrinsic error). The error related to the monitoring data belongs to the problem of quality control of professional monitoring; while the background field error is related to the model's internal errorserrors caused mainly by physical processes that are not fully understood [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%