2020
DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2020.1850179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving hyperspectral sub-pixel target detection in multiple target signatures using a revised replacement signal model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next subsection, we describe two different procedures to solve problem (19). Denoting by α the generic solution returned by these procedures, we use it in (17) and the final expression of the detection architecture is…”
Section: Glrt-based Detector Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the next subsection, we describe two different procedures to solve problem (19). Denoting by α the generic solution returned by these procedures, we use it in (17) and the final expression of the detection architecture is…”
Section: Glrt-based Detector Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Solution to Equation (19) The approach devised here relies on an iterative solution of (19). In particular, we firstly highlight the dependence of the objective function from a single entry of α, say α j , and then, at each iteration, we minimize g(α) with respect to α j as the index j varies.…”
Section: Glrt-based Detector Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we resort to an hyperspectral dataset, namely the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) experiment 3 [18]. The RIT open data experiment has been specially designed for target detection and has been widely used in the open literature [12], [19]. Indeed, a corrected and geo-registered reflectance map is available so that the detection performance will be independent from any particular experimental setup.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the role of traditional methods such as terrestrial mapping and traditional aerial photogrammetry techniques has been dimmed due to the high cost and also the need for a long time to generate a multi-task dataset for scene understanding (Crawshaw, 2020;Masouleh and Sadeghian, 2019;Ruder, 2017;Zhang and Yang, 2018). An affordable and accurate way to generate multitask data is to use the combination of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) with a high-resolution digital camera (e.g., RGB, Multi-spectral, Thermal, or Hyperspectral) and machine learning methods (Bayanlou and Khoshboresh-Masouleh, 2020;Khoshboresh-Masouleh and Hasanlou, 2020). Although UAV with a high-resolution digital camera is an efficient tool for data generation, there is still a lack of multi-task datasets for scene understanding (Khoshboresh Masouleh and Shah-Hosseini, 2019).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%