Improving implementation of evidence-based practice in mental health service delivery: protocol for a cluster randomised quasi-experimental investigation of staff-focused values interventions

Abstract

BackgroundThere is growing acceptance that optimal service provision for individuals with severe and recurrent mental illness requires a complementary focus on medical recovery (i.e., symptom management and general functioning) and personal recovery (i.e., having a ‘life worth living’). Despite significant research attention and policy-level support, the translation of this vision of healthcare into changed workplace practice continues to elude. Over the past decade, evidence-based training interventions that seek to enhance the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of staff working in the mental health field have been implemented as a primary redress strategy. However, a large body of multi-disciplinary research indicates disappointing rates of training transfer. There is an absence of empirical research that investigates the importance of worker-motivation in the uptake of desired workplace change initiatives. ‘Autonomy’ is acknowledged as important to human effectiveness and as a correlate of workplace variables like productivity, and wellbeing. To our knowledge, there have been no studies that investigate purposeful and structured use of values-based interventions to facilitate increased autonomy as a means of promoting enhanced implementation of workplace change.MethodsThis study involves 200 mental health workers across 22 worksites within five community-managed organisations in three Australian states. It involves cluster-randomisation of participants within organisation, by work site, to the experimental (values) condition, or the control (implementation). Both conditions receive two days of training focusing on an evidence-based framework of mental health service delivery. The experimental group receives a third day of values-focused intervention and 12 months of values-focused coaching. Well-validated self-report measures are used to explore variables related to values concordance, autonomy, and self-reported implementation success. Audits of work files and staff work samples are reviewed for each condition to determine the impact of implementation. Self-determination theory and theories of organisational change are used to interpret the data.DiscussionThe research adds to the current knowledge base related to worker motivation and uptake of workplace practice. It describes a structured protocol that aims to enhance worker autonomy for imposed workplace practices. The research will inform how best to measure and conceptualise transfer. These findings will apply particularly to contexts where individuals are not ‘volunteers’ in requisite change processes.Trial registrationACTRN: ACTRN12613000353796.

The property of the Japanese version of the Recovery Knowledge Inventory (RKI) among mental health service providers: a cross sectional study

“…RKI has revealed some factors associated with recovery orientation in cross-sectional studies [ 18 – 20 ], as well as in longitudinal studies [ 21 ]. Appreciably, in recent years, RKI has been notably used in several interventional studies in Australia [ 22 – 25 ], USA [ 26 ], Canada [ 27 , 28 ], UK [ 29 ], and Netherlands [ 30 ], as various educational programs have been developed for service providers to enhance recovery orientation.…”

A Narrative Review of Recent Developments in Knowledge Translation and Implications for Mental Health Care Providers

“…As it has been noted that gaps between science and practice are great in the field of mental health, 2,27,69 KT strategies may hold particular value.…”

“…Regarding the effectiveness of KT efforts to foster innovation and improvement in mental health programs, various authors have emphasized the importance of organizational culture and attitudes of health care providers. 2,9,69 Within the cultures in which mental health care providers operate, particular value is often placed on tacit knowledge, that is, knowledge that is developed from direct experience and action, highly pragmatic and situation-specific, and often understood and applied subconsciously and thus difficult to articulate or codify. 68 Tacit knowledge is often distinguished from explicit knowledge, which follows logic, can be codified, written down, and effectively communicated to others.…”

Sustaining SLUG Bug CLABSI Reduction: Does Sterile Tubing Change Technique Really Work?

“…16,17 To change behavior, the beliefs and values of individual stakeholders and local interdisciplinary teams must align with one another, the proposed change effort, and, ultimately, organizational goals. 18 Wellfunctioning interdisciplinary teams are crucial to transform care in any health system. Implementing and sustaining change require a culture that supports adoption not only of innovation but also of adaptability to innovate for both individuals and teams.…”

“…Implementing and sustaining change require a culture that supports adoption not only of innovation but also of adaptability to innovate for both individuals and teams. 18,19 Periodic collaborative calls during the sustain phase were used to check in with teams and to encourage sustainable practices and principles. Faculty advisors continued to track progress reports and provided ongoing support for local teams.…”