2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Implicit Stance Classification in Tweets Using Word and Sentence Embeddings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the utterance "I am supportive of A, but I'm totally against B", the author expresses a supporting stance towards target A and an opposing stance towards target B. The target may be implicit and not always directly mentioned in the text (Schaefer & Stede, 2019). The target may be implicitly referred to Sobhani et al (2019), or only aspects of it may be mentioned (Bar-Haim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stance Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the utterance "I am supportive of A, but I'm totally against B", the author expresses a supporting stance towards target A and an opposing stance towards target B. The target may be implicit and not always directly mentioned in the text (Schaefer & Stede, 2019). The target may be implicitly referred to Sobhani et al (2019), or only aspects of it may be mentioned (Bar-Haim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Stance Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the utterance "I am supportive of A, but I'm totally against B", the author expresses a supporting stance towards target A and an opposing stance towards target B. The target may be implicit and not always directly mentioned in the text [77]. The target may be implicitly referred to [83], or only aspects of it may be mentioned [11].…”
Section: Stance Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%