2022
DOI: 10.4000/rga.9826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Knowledge about Snow by Crossing Qualitative and Quantitative Data from the Everest Region (Nepal)

Abstract: The authors would especially like to thank the members of the PAPRIKA team (ANR-09-CEP-005-05/PAPRIKA) without whom these disciplinary interactions would not have been possible and who encouraged the encounter between geography and hydrology and subsequent exchanges, and also the members of the PRESHINE project (ANR 13-SENV-0005-01 and ANR-13-SENV-0005-02) during which this dynamic was maintained. Similarly, the authors address a huge thank you to the Nepalese who accompanied them during their fieldwork throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite its advantages, the choice of HDSM has one major drawback: the surface area of the glacier remains static over time. Consequently, the results of applying the model to long time intervals need to be interpreted with caution and this is undoubtedly a limit, although Puschiasis et al (2022) did so in a previous study conducted in the Mount Everest region in Nepal. The limits of doing so in the present study are addressed in the discussion.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite its advantages, the choice of HDSM has one major drawback: the surface area of the glacier remains static over time. Consequently, the results of applying the model to long time intervals need to be interpreted with caution and this is undoubtedly a limit, although Puschiasis et al (2022) did so in a previous study conducted in the Mount Everest region in Nepal. The limits of doing so in the present study are addressed in the discussion.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%