2016
DOI: 10.26686/pq.v12i1.4582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving management of invasive species: New Zealand’s approach to pre- and post-border pests

Abstract: Biological invasions are a ubiquitous global concern. Invasive species are non-native species that arrive in a new area, establish and increase in density and distribution to the detriment of the recipient environment. Such species that become invasive are a major threat to biodiversity (Vitousek and D’Antonio, 1997). Unlike inanimate risks, living things establish, reproduce and often spread, leading to enormous environmental and economic effects (Vilà et al., 2010).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Framed in this context of overarching uncertainties and high costs, strong preventive policies should be a priority to address the emergent threat of alien reptiles on islands and elsewhere (Jarrad et al 2011;Rout et al 2014;Lodge et al 2016;Scott et al 2017). As a first step, public agencies tasked with preventive policies for managing alien species (e.g., environmental protection and primary industries agencies) should implement strict quarantine measures and biosecurity regulations (Meyerson and Reaser 2002;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Early et al 2016). These measures and regulations should be aimed at detecting incoming alien reptiles at quarantine border controls before those individuals can escape containment into the wild (Meyerson and Reaser 2002;Jarrad et al 2015;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Chapple et al 2016;Scott et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Framed in this context of overarching uncertainties and high costs, strong preventive policies should be a priority to address the emergent threat of alien reptiles on islands and elsewhere (Jarrad et al 2011;Rout et al 2014;Lodge et al 2016;Scott et al 2017). As a first step, public agencies tasked with preventive policies for managing alien species (e.g., environmental protection and primary industries agencies) should implement strict quarantine measures and biosecurity regulations (Meyerson and Reaser 2002;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Early et al 2016). These measures and regulations should be aimed at detecting incoming alien reptiles at quarantine border controls before those individuals can escape containment into the wild (Meyerson and Reaser 2002;Jarrad et al 2015;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Chapple et al 2016;Scott et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a first step, public agencies tasked with preventive policies for managing alien species (e.g., environmental protection and primary industries agencies) should implement strict quarantine measures and biosecurity regulations (Meyerson and Reaser 2002;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Early et al 2016). These measures and regulations should be aimed at detecting incoming alien reptiles at quarantine border controls before those individuals can escape containment into the wild (Meyerson and Reaser 2002;Jarrad et al 2015;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Chapple et al 2016;Scott et al 2017). Australia and New Zealand have biosecurity arrangements in place, even if imperfect, to achieve these two management goals and islands elsewhere could draw lessons from these two countries to implement their own preventive strategies (Jarrad et al 2011;Brenton-Rule et al 2016;Chapple et al 2016;García-Díaz et al 2017b;Scott et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the two approaches have different benefits, limitations and costs, blacklists became far more common worldwide, with white lists being limited to a few countries [4] . For example, the European Regulation on invasive alien species (n. 1143/2014), addressing biological invasions in all the member states of the European Union since January 2015, produced a first list of 37 IAS of European concern (hereinafter European blacklist) in August 2016, which was then updated in 2017 (49 species) and 2019 (66 species).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong increase in international trade in last decades has generated an increase in the probability that many species can be established outside their natural range. For that reason, countries worldwide make great efforts to avoid dispersion of invasive species, regulating the phytosanitary condition of plant products on international trade (Levine & D'Antonio, 2003;Brenton-Rule et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%