2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018wr024644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Medium‐Range Forecasts of Rain‐on‐Snow Events in Prealpine Areas

Abstract: Rain‐on‐snow (RoS) events have caused severe floods in mountainous catchments in the recent past. Challenges in forecasting such events are uncertainties in meteorological input variables, the accurate estimation of snow cover and deficits in process understanding during runoff formation. Here, we evaluate the potential of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF IFS) to forecast RoS disposition (i.e., minimum rainfall amounts, initial snow cover, and meltwate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate simulation of ROS flooding is challenging due to various factors such as rain intensity and amount, prevailing freezing level, and spatial distribution of snow cover. Either of these uncertainties could contribute to bias in predicting the peak flow during ROS events (Fehlmann et al., 2019). Although SNOTEL simulation indicated a good match in SWE simulation in 1997, one SNOTEL site may not represent all mountain ranges, and the SNOTEL network is biased toward specific types of terrain and vegetation (Mote et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate simulation of ROS flooding is challenging due to various factors such as rain intensity and amount, prevailing freezing level, and spatial distribution of snow cover. Either of these uncertainties could contribute to bias in predicting the peak flow during ROS events (Fehlmann et al., 2019). Although SNOTEL simulation indicated a good match in SWE simulation in 1997, one SNOTEL site may not represent all mountain ranges, and the SNOTEL network is biased toward specific types of terrain and vegetation (Mote et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, we Except for one year (1997) when the observed streamflow peak was significantly greater than the simulated value at the USGS gauge 10296000, other periods had a very good agreement between the simulations and observations. In the calibration period, statistical comparisons of measured events (Fehlmann et al, 2019). Although SNOTEL simulation indicated a good match in 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 simulation in 1997, one SNOTEL site may not represent all mountain ranges, and the SNOTEL network is biased towards specific types of terrain and vegetation (Mote et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of convective rainfall, dominant in the tropics, remains a challenge in the current generation of NWP, including the ECMWF IFS that GloFAS are based on (Haiden et al, 2019). Additionally, hydrological prediction in regions with more challenging hydroclimate conditions, particularly snowy catchments, where simplified snow accumulation and melt processes as well as rain-on-snow events are known to be highly sensitive to error (Fehlmann et al, 2019). (1-(a), 3-(b), 5-(c), and 10-days (d)) with respect to GloFAS-ERA5 river discharge reanalysis at 5997 diagnostic river points.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Glofas Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%