Improving Membrane Filtration for Copper Speciation: Optimal Salt Pretreatments of Polyethersulfone Membranes to Prevent Analyte Retention

Abstract

Membrane filtration has been increasingly used to separate dissolved metal ions from dispersed particles, commonly using ultrafiltration membranes, for example, polyethersulfone (PES) membranes with a molecular weight cut-off of 3 kDa. The disadvantage of this technique is an undesired retention of ions, resulting from Coulomb interactions with sulfonic acid groups of the membrane. Therefore, such a membrane acts similar to a cation exchanger column. We solved this drawback by a pretreatment of the PES membrane by other cations. Using CuSO 4 as a model compound, we compared the effectiveness of five cations using their salt solutions (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Fe 2+ , Ag + , Ba 2+ ) as pretreatment agents and identified the most effective pretreatment component for a high recovery of copper ions. After membrane filtration without pretreatment, only 52 ± 10%, 64 ± 5%, 75 ± 8%, and 89 ± 7% of nominal Cu concentrations were obtained using initial concentrations of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 4.0 mg L −1 , respectively. The efficiency of the investigated cations increased in the order Fe < Ag < Mg < Ca < Ba. Furthermore, we analyzed the most efficient concentration of the pretreatment agent. The best performance was achieved using 0.1 mol L −1 CaCl 2 which increased copper recovery to slightly below 100%, even at the lowest tested Cu concentration (recovery 93 ± 10% at 0.2 mg L −1 ). In the environmentally relevant Cu concentration range of 0.2 mg L -1 , 0.1 mol L −1 BaCl 2 was identified as the most efficient pretreatment (103 ± 11%).

Biotic and Abiotic Interactions in Freshwater Mesocosms Determine Fate and Toxicity of CuO Nanoparticles

“…Subsequently the samples were freeze-dried (Alpha 1-2 LDplus, Christ GmbH; −45.1 ± 1.53 °C, 0.07 ± 0.01 mbar). Afterward they were digested with HNO 3 (65%) (see SI), and finally the copper content was determined by GF-AAS. , …”

“…Afterward they were digested with HNO 3 (65%) (see SI), and finally the copper content was determined by GF-AAS. 38,39 The average background copper concentration of the upper sediment layer in the control treatment was 0.031 ± 0.032 mg Cu L −1 , and for the water column it was 0.008 ± 0.007 mg Cu L −1 .…”