2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
108
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, questions about the extent to which a set of items measure the same underlying construct can be addressed through item response analysis. In summary of the item response analysis described in Vaughn et al (2013) and replicated in Vaughn et al (2014), the fit was very good for the ASK Knowledge Acquisition test: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, questions about the extent to which a set of items measure the same underlying construct can be addressed through item response analysis. In summary of the item response analysis described in Vaughn et al (2013) and replicated in Vaughn et al (2014), the fit was very good for the ASK Knowledge Acquisition test: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A number of intervention studies have documented a positive relation between fidelity of implementation and program outcomes (Durlak & DuPre, 2008;Fogarty et al, 2014;Vaughn et al, 2013Vaughn et al, , 2015. The effects of adaptation on program outcomes and sustainability, however, are less clear.…”
Section: Fidelity and Adaptation: Two Dimensions Of Program Implementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is accomplished through activities that build background knowledge and vocabulary through pre-teaching and meaning-based questions about text as well as through small group collaborative discussions of content that are designed to facilitate problem-solving and perspective taking (Beck, & McKeown, 2006; Beck, McKeown, Sandora, Kucan, & Worthy, 1996; McKeown, Beck, & Blake, 2009; Vaughn, Roberts, Swanson, Wanzek, Fall et al, 2015; Vaughn, Swanson, Roberts, Wanzek, Stillman-Spisak et al, 2013). In general, results suggest that content approaches lead to significant gains in knowledge acquisition (Vaughn, Roberts, et al, 2015; Vaughn, Swanson et al, 2013) and narrative and expository recall (McKeown et al, 2009), but they have not consistently impacted standardized measures of reading comprehension among students in grades 5-8 (Scammacca, Roberts, Vaughn, & Stuebing, 2015). …”
Section: Content and Text-processing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently this focus on disciplinary literacy has led to the evaluation of discipline specific instructional models that are tailored to build domain knowledge and comprehension skills that are specific to the types of texts and tasks used in secondary grade content area classrooms (e.g., English Language Arts and Social Studies) (Swanson, Wanzek, McCulley, Stillman-Spisak, Vaughn et al, 2016; Vaughn, Martinez, Wanzek, Roberts, Swanson, et al, 2016; Vaughn, Roberts, Swanson, Wanzek, Fall et al, 2015; Vaughn, Swanson et al, 2013). Across studies, results suggest that a focus on disciplinary literacy is associated with improved outcomes in reading comprehension (Vaughn et al, 2013), content acquisition and vocabulary (Vaughn et al., 2013, 2015), and sustained content knowledge and vocabulary over the course of the school year (Vaughn et al, 2015).…”
Section: Mastery Of Disciplinary Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation