2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-014-0316-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving news articles recommendations via user clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have employed this method for the systematic organization of the content and its retrieval. Further, RSS news feeds are represented in Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) formats [9]. This method is effective if the similar news items are merged together to gather the news from various sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have employed this method for the systematic organization of the content and its retrieval. Further, RSS news feeds are represented in Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) formats [9]. This method is effective if the similar news items are merged together to gather the news from various sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, texts contain only few words grow at unprecedented rates from a wide range of popular resources, including Reddit, Stackoverflow, Twitter, and Instagram. Clustering those texts into groups of similar texts plays a crucial role in many real-world applications such as topic discovery (Kim et al, 2013), trend detection (Mathioudakis and Koudas, 2010), and recommendation (Bouras and Tsogkas, 2017). We evaluate on six benchmark datasets for short text clustering.…”
Section: Semantic Textual Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One first case designed for news recommendation ( [20]) proposes a method for representing two faceted-profiles: a long-term subprofile comprising terms and categories from the history of relevant documents; a short-term one, with the same infor-mation but created after the first subprofile has been built. A second example is [7], where the profile comprises two subprofiles: the list of terms extracted from positively judged documents, enriched by the terms belonging to the cluster to which the user belongs (after applying K-means to every user) and enriched by Wordnet hypernyms, and the terms from negatively judged documents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where information coming from one source (typically documents) is organized into different profiles [20], in our proposal, we do not consider positive and negative documents. In the second reference, [7], the authors apply global clustering at the user level (users are the instances and the terms, the attributes) while our clustering is carried out at the document level and locally (only for the active user).…”
Section: Differences Of Our Approach With the Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%