Improving nursing documentation for surgical patients in a referral hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone: protocol for assessing feasibility of a pilot multifaceted quality improvement hybrid type project

Abstract

Background There is an urgent need to improve quality of care to reduce avoidable mortality and morbidity from surgical diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge about how evidence-based health system strengthening interventions can be implemented effectively to improve quality of care in these settings. To address this gap, we have developed a multifaceted quality improvement intervention to improve nursing documentation in a low-income country hospital setting. The aim of this pilot project is to test the intervention within the surgical department of a national referral hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Methods This project was co-developed and co-designed by in-country stakeholders and UK-based researchers, after a multiple-methodology assessment of needs (qualitative, quantitative), guided by a participatory ‘Theory of Change’ process. It has a mixed-method, quasi-experimental evaluation design underpinned by implementation and improvement science theoretical approaches. It consists of three distinct phases—(1) pre-implementation(project set up and review of hospital relevant policies and forms), (2) intervention implementation (awareness drive, training package, audit and feedback), and (3) evaluation of (a) the feasibility of delivering the intervention and capturing implementation and process outcomes, (b) the impact of implementation strategies on the adoption, integration, and uptake of the intervention using implementation outcomes, (c) the intervention’s effectiveness For improving nursing in this pilot setting. Discussion We seek to test whether it is possible to deliver and assess a set of theory-driven interventions to improve the quality of nursing documentation using quality improvement and implementation science methods and frameworks in a single facility in Sierra Leone. The results of this study will inform the design of a large-scale effectiveness-implementation study for improving nursing documentation practices for patients throughout hospitals in Sierra Leone. Trial registration Protocol version number 6, date: 24.12.2020, recruitment is planned to begin: January 2021, recruitment will be completed: December 2021.

A collaboration to improve perioperative acute pain care at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare, Rwanda

“…Our study demonstrated enablers and barriers to the improvement of pain care in LMICs and will inform similar QIC initiatives and evaluations proposed for the future [37]. Future QICs should be dedicated to long-term commitment and collaboration with local experts, as fostering these relationships cannot be rushed and are the foundation to sustained improvement.…”

Impact of advanced practice nurses in hospital units on compliance with clinical practice guidelines: a quasi-experimental study

“…Although these figures increased overall, the increase was sharper in the intervention unit. Clinical documentation is an essential part of nursing care [ 58 ], by facilitating access to valid patient data and enabling healthcare providers to make a timely evaluation and deliver appropriate follow-up [ 59 ].…”

Implementation of an electronic health record system during global surgical outreach: A prospective evaluation of success and sustainability

“…13,17 Acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption, fidelity, and sustainability were utilized as measures of early implementation success. 13,20,21 The definitions, measurement tools, and rigorous a priori definitions of success are illustrated in Table 3. We used acceptability as the primary outcome for assessing success based on use in prior work.…”

“…22,23 Each measure of implementation success is based upon previously utilized and validated survey instruments. 20,21,24 The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) were utilized to measure acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, respectively (Appendix A). The AIM, IAM, and FIM have been shown to have strong psychometric properties, including validity, reliability, and structural invariance.…”