2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving of Small Farm Market Capability in Latvia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new farm entities were short of equipment and capital, with many heirs having other occupations (Knudsen 2012). More than 2/3 of Baltic smallscale farmers still have no formal agricultural training and lack expertise in running a modern farm business, frequently leaving land idle, and vast rural areas are struggling with poverty (Leimane et al 2014;Žakevičiūtė 2019).…”
Section: Lithuania Latvia and Estonia: Different But Reactivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new farm entities were short of equipment and capital, with many heirs having other occupations (Knudsen 2012). More than 2/3 of Baltic smallscale farmers still have no formal agricultural training and lack expertise in running a modern farm business, frequently leaving land idle, and vast rural areas are struggling with poverty (Leimane et al 2014;Žakevičiūtė 2019).…”
Section: Lithuania Latvia and Estonia: Different But Reactivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a threat both to the future survival of smaller farms and to the overall competitiveness of the agricultural sector of the Baltic countries. According to the farmers, the most significant barriers for development and reasons for low production efficiency are lack of the required production assets and difficulties in attracting funding for long-term investments in Latvia [1]. While analysing the development of agriculture in Lithuania and Estonia, researchers point out that small and medium-sized farms do not possess sufficient opportunities for investment in farm modernization and implementation of new technologies [2; 3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%