2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving organic transistor performance through contact-area-limited doping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the dopant mole­cules is near (ideally below) the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the host semiconductor, electrons can move from the host semiconductor to the dopant molecules, thereby creating excess holes in the semiconductor and thus increasing its electrical conductivity 18–22. This concept has previously been applied to organic p‐channel TFTs with channel lengths down to 300 nm 23–28. In all these reports, however, the gate electrode of the TFTs was not patterned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the dopant mole­cules is near (ideally below) the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the host semiconductor, electrons can move from the host semiconductor to the dopant molecules, thereby creating excess holes in the semiconductor and thus increasing its electrical conductivity 18–22. This concept has previously been applied to organic p‐channel TFTs with channel lengths down to 300 nm 23–28. In all these reports, however, the gate electrode of the TFTs was not patterned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we cannot measure the orbital energies at the DNTT/NDP‐9 interface, we have to rely on conclusions from other measurements to elucidate the energy lineup at the DNTT/NDP‐9 interface. SI, Figure S4, summarizes the results of several measurements we have carried out to compare the doping strength of NDP‐9 to that of an organic dopant that has been previously employed in organic TFTs, 2,3,5,6‐tetrafluoro‐7,7,8,8‐tetracyanoquinodimethane (F 4 ‐TCNQ) 26, 27. We found that the sheet resistance of a 30 nm‐thick DNTT layer doped with NDP‐9 (nominally 1 nm thick) is a factor of 7 smaller than the sheet resistance of a 30 nm‐thick DNTT layer doped with F 4 ‐TCNQ (also nominally 1 nm thick; SI, Figure S4a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of p-channel OTFTs, strong acceptor molecules such as ferric chloride (FeCl 3 ), 3-5 molybdenum trioxide (MoO 3 ), 6,7 and 2,3,5,6tetrafluoro-7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F 4 TCNQ) [8][9][10][11] are doped into the interface between the contact electrode and the active p-type semiconductor layer in order to form hole-doped interface layers, thereby resulting in lowering of the hole injection barrier or the bulk resistance. 1,2 Contact-area-limited doping has been widely studied and employed to enhance the charge carrier injection from a contact electrode to a semiconductor layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Recently, the improvement of device performance in top-contact p-channel organic thin-film transistors was demonstrated by contact-area-limited doping, where an electron-acceptor-doped layer was formed at the interface between a semiconductor layer and a contact electrode. [4][5][6][7] Since these molecular doping methods have been employed for controlling the electrical conductivity of organic semiconductors, [8][9][10][11][12] it has been commonly considered that p-type doping of the organic layer causes the decrease of the contact resistance and the hole injection barrier. However, it was also reported that acceptor=electrode charge transfer (without any organic=organic charge transfer) can also mimic p-type doping of the organic layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%