Improving Outcomes for Persons With Aphasia in Advanced Community-Based Treatment Programs

Abstract

Background and Purpose-Studies have yet to document that community-based aphasia treatment programs routinely produce results comparable or superior to published research protocols. We explore this issue here in an outcome study of individuals with aphasia enrolled in 2 community-based, comparably managed and equipped therapy programs, which use a specially designed computer-based tool that is employed therapeutically in adherence to an extensive, detailed, and formally trained patient care algorithm. Methods-Patients (nϭ60) were assessed before and after treatment with standardized instruments at both the impairment and the disability levels. Pretreatment and posttreatment means were calculated and compared, with statistical significance of differences established with the use of 1-tailed matched t tests. One-way ANOVAs were used to analyze the comparability of patient performance changes among various subgroups, eg, patients in acute versus chronic stages of aphasia, patients by aphasia diagnostic type at start of care, patients by severity level at start of care, and patients by treatment location. Results-Analysis shows that patients spanned a wide range of aphasia diagnostic types, impairment severity levels at start of care, and times after onset. Patients' mean performance scores improved significantly in response to treatment in all measures assessed at both the impairment level and the functional communication level. Mean overall improvements ranged from 6.6% to 19.8%, with statistical significance ranging from Pϭ0.0006 to PϽ0.0001. ANOVAs revealed no significant differences between improvements in patients in the acute versus chronic stages of aphasia, between those at different impairment severity levels at start of care, between those treated at different locations, or, at the functional level, between those with different diagnostic types of aphasia at start of care. Conclusions--Measures of both language impairment and functional communication can be broadly, positively, and significantly influenced by therapy services that are delivered to persons with aphasia in these community-based programs. The significant improvements are shown to be available to individuals with chronic as well as acute aphasia and independent of diagnostic type of aphasia, impairment severity at start of care, or geographic program location.

Comprehensive Overview of Nursing and Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Care of the Stroke Patient

“…298,329 That is, stroke patients receiving outpatient services continue to display a similar spectrum of types and severities of communication and cognitive impairments, and thus, information already reviewed for inpatient settings also applies to outpatient settings.…”

Stress and language recovery in individuals with aphasia: constraint induced aphasia therapy

“…Nearly onethird of individuals who suffer CVA will develop some degree of aphasia [1][2][3][4]. Individuals with aphasia typically have difficulty processing and expressing language [5] and will need some type of speech and language therapy.…”

Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia After Stroke

“…1 A general consensus exists that most of the spontaneous recovery in linguistic function occurs in the first weeks after stroke 1 and is completed by the end of the first year, 2 although reports exist of improvements occurring as a result of long-term therapy of patients with chronic aphasia. [3][4][5][6] Traditional wisdom also had held that recovery of extremity movement usually was not possible Ͼ1 year after stroke. 7 However, a new family of treatments, called "constraintinduced movement therapy" or, more briefly, "CI therapy," has been shown in controlled experiments to produce large improvements in the actual amount of use of more-affected upper and lower extremities.…”