2011 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ssp.2011.5967661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving particle approximations of the joint smoothing distribution with linear computational cost

Abstract: International audienceParticle smoothers are widely used algorithms allowing to approximate the smoothing distribution in hidden Markov models. Existing algorithms often suffer from slow computational time or degeneracy. We propose in this paper a way to improve any of them with a linear complexity in the number of particles. When iteratively applied to the degenerated Filter-Smoother, this method leads to an algorithm which turns out to outperform all other linear particle smoothers for a fixed computational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial state is modeled asp0 ∼ N (x0, P0). Since a k is not available until after RS-iteration k + 1, we make one step ahead predictions p k|k−1 , which are used in place ofp k in the stopping rule (6). The additional steps for Algorithm 3, required by the adaptive stopping rule, are given in Algorithm 4.…”
Section: Adaptive Stoppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial state is modeled asp0 ∼ N (x0, P0). Since a k is not available until after RS-iteration k + 1, we make one step ahead predictions p k|k−1 , which are used in place ofp k in the stopping rule (6). The additional steps for Algorithm 3, required by the adaptive stopping rule, are given in Algorithm 4.…”
Section: Adaptive Stoppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several SMC-based smoothing algorithms, i.e., particle smoothers (PS), have been presented in the literature. These include forward filtering/backward smoothing (FFBSm) [3], two-filter smoothing [4,5] and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) smoothing [6,7,8]. However, it remains a major challenge to develop accurate and computationally efficient methods for particle smoothing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method which is related to MH-FFBP is the Metropolis-Hastings improved particle smoother (MH-IPS), suggested by Dubarry and Douc (2011). The method is also reminiscent of the resample-move algorithm ).…”
Section: Metropolis-hastings Improved Particle Smoothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation studies conducted by Dubarry and Douc (2011), only a few MCMC Algorithm 9 Metropolis-Hastings improved particle smoother (Dubarry and Douc, 2011) Input: Forward filter particle trajectories {x…”
Section: Dubarry and Doucmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation