16th Asian Test Symposium (ATS 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ats.2007.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Performance of Effect-Cause Diagnosis with Minimal Memory Overhead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 8, each stacked column represents the distribution of suspect count change for a defect type for a design. The change is segmented into five categories: fewer suspects (<0), no change (=0), between 1 and 5 ( [1,5]), between 6 and 10 ( [6,10]), and larger than 10 (> 10). For many of the designs and various fault types, more than 90% of the cases have a suspect count equal to or less than that of diagnosis using the original design.…”
Section: A Partitioning Results and Impact On Diagnosis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 8, each stacked column represents the distribution of suspect count change for a defect type for a design. The change is segmented into five categories: fewer suspects (<0), no change (=0), between 1 and 5 ( [1,5]), between 6 and 10 ( [6,10]), and larger than 10 (> 10). For many of the designs and various fault types, more than 90% of the cases have a suspect count equal to or less than that of diagnosis using the original design.…”
Section: A Partitioning Results and Impact On Diagnosis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For design with millions of gates, the cause-effect methods require a large amount of storage. This problem can be relieved by compressing the fault dictionary [8] [9], nevertheless, the memory required for saving the compressed fault dictionary is still proportional to the size of the design and the number of test patterns rendering the inapplicable for large industrial designs with hundreds of millions of gates [10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect-Cause Diagnosis [8], [9], [37] We know that cause-effect diagnosis paradigm is impractical for diagnosing large designs as the fault dictionary pre-built is too large to be accepted. However, one can build a fault dictionary of small size whose memory overhead is reasonable to speed-up the effect-cause diagnosis procedures [8], [9], [37]. The effect-cause algorithm used in the previous works [8], [9], [37] has two phases as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Fault Dictionaries Based Methods To Acceleratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size can be further reduced by recording only k failing test patterns at the cost of slightly degrading the resolution. Researchers in [8], [9] proposed a technique to compress the fault dictionary by using a multiple input signature register (MISR) to generate a compressed fault signature. One problem for this method is two difference test responses may be compressed to the same failing signature.…”
Section: Cause-effect Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation