2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44533-1_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Performance of GP by Adaptive Terminal Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we reached a complexity barrier for the evolutionary process; too many terminals lead to an explosion of the search space resulting in a problem that is too hard to solve with a standard general purpose PC in an acceptable time span. This is a concern that is shared by other authors in the field as well [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here we reached a complexity barrier for the evolutionary process; too many terminals lead to an explosion of the search space resulting in a problem that is too hard to solve with a standard general purpose PC in an acceptable time span. This is a concern that is shared by other authors in the field as well [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During each generation, the feature weight vector is updated while considering all individuals in the population. Similar work proposed previously by Ok et al [Ok et al 2000] where only the top 10% of the solutions are considered when computing the feature weight vector. However, in their approach, re-initialization of the original feature space is performed to omit irrelevant terminal variables.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In GP, Ok et al [17] proposed an adaptive terminal selection scheme and corresponding adaptive mutation based on the updated terminal set. Friedlander et al [3] proposed a feature ranking method based on frequency analysis.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%