2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2016.2594765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Performance of Heterogeneous MapReduce Clusters with Adaptive Task Tuning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors claim that the makespan is improved over 20 % compared to the classical MapReduce schedulers. In a virtual environment with heterogeneous capacities, containers for heterogeneous jobs are dynamically decided at runtime by Cheng et al and improved latency and resource utilization by 20 % , and 1 % , respectively. Two classes of algorithms are proposed in the work of Tang et al to minimize makespan and total completion time for a batch of workloads in a virtual environment.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Authors claim that the makespan is improved over 20 % compared to the classical MapReduce schedulers. In a virtual environment with heterogeneous capacities, containers for heterogeneous jobs are dynamically decided at runtime by Cheng et al and improved latency and resource utilization by 20 % , and 1 % , respectively. Two classes of algorithms are proposed in the work of Tang et al to minimize makespan and total completion time for a batch of workloads in a virtual environment.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, works by Hu et al and Bei et al for heterogeneous MapReduce workloads in heterogeneous VM capacities try to minimize the makespan and improve resource utilization. More specifically, other works tune configuration parameters to exploit the heterogeneous capacity available in the virtual nodes, whereas Hu et al and Ming‐Chang et al classify the jobs to schedule map/reduce tasks based on the computing performance of a node. The significant shortcomings of these works are as follows: Tuning configuration parameters dynamically is job specific. Data locality is affected while concentrating on the performance of a node to place tasks. …”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method achieves this by dividing the nodes into a number of homogeneous sub-clusters and applies a self-tuning algorithm on individual sub-clusters. The experimental results by Dazhao Cheng et al (2017) show that their flex slot technique reduces the job completion time by 46% compared to the stock Hadoop cluster and by 22% compared to Skew Tune. Shanjiang Tang et al (2016) proposed a new fair resource allocation mechanism, the Long-Term Resource Fairness (LTRF).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [14], authors present new centroids initialization approach to improving the basic k-means algorithm with high-quality clusters. Authors in papers [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] have tried to improve the clustering algorithms which are used in various domains like networking and biometrics. However, these algorithms can be improved further.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%